Search alternatives:
significant factor » significant factors (Expand Search)
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
factor decrease » factors increases (Expand Search)
teer decrease » mean decrease (Expand Search), greater decrease (Expand Search)
significant factor » significant factors (Expand Search)
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
factor decrease » factors increases (Expand Search)
teer decrease » mean decrease (Expand Search), greater decrease (Expand Search)
-
121
-
122
Consolidation of training-induced changes in unipedal stance: 95% Area, Y Sway Amplitude and LFS.
Published 2025Subjects: -
123
-
124
-
125
-
126
-
127
-
128
-
129
Box plots showing the taxa that were significantly different between thin and normal cows.
Published 2025Subjects: -
130
-
131
-
132
-
133
-
134
-
135
Demographics of the study population.
Published 2024“…In the comparison among the ipsilateral, contralateral side of iPD with clinical laterality, and disease control group, the OBH of the disease control group was significantly larger than both the ipsilateral and contralateral sides (<i>P</i> < 0.05). …”
-
136
Table 3 -
Published 2024“…In the comparison among the ipsilateral, contralateral side of iPD with clinical laterality, and disease control group, the OBH of the disease control group was significantly larger than both the ipsilateral and contralateral sides (<i>P</i> < 0.05). …”
-
137
Bivariate analysis of sociodemographic and other factors associated with the knowledge scores.
Published 2025Subjects: -
138
Bivariate analysis of sociodemographic and other factors associated with the attitude scores.
Published 2025Subjects: -
139
Multivariate analysis of sociodemographic and other factors associated with the KAP scores.
Published 2025Subjects: -
140
Bivariate analysis of sociodemographic and other factors associated with the practice scores.
Published 2025Subjects: