The primer sequences for gene editing. by Yixin Zhang (173038)

Scheme of g-λ model with larger values λ. by Zhanfeng Fan (20390992)

“…The findings suggest that when λ is respectively equal to 4.19, 8.57, 10, and 12.15, the peak particle velocity (PPV) of the transmitted waves is significantly close to the incident wave amplitude. Furthermore, when λ is fixed, the energy transmission coefficient increases with the incident wave amplitude but decreases with the incident wave frequency. …”

Shear stress-strain responses of the reticulocyte membrane at decreased connectivity of the cytoskeleton. by He Li (176971)

Cas9/sgRNA mediated gene editing of <i>BmVps13d</i>. by Luochao Zhao (13014710)

CRISPR/Cas9-induced <i>OsSWEET14</i> promoter modification in TBR225 rice. by Phuong Nguyen Duy (11414117)

The effect of HA digestion and HA replenishment alone or with CS on barrier function measured by TEER. by Charlotte J. van Ginkel (20790466)

“…PS decreased TEER. (C) Different treatments (treatment groups n = 8)with HA and/or CS did not affect TEER recovery after PS treatment, full recovery was seen in all groups after 24 hours. …”

CRISPR/Cas9-mediated editing of barley lipoxygenase genes promotes grain fatty acid accumulation and storability by Zhanghui Zeng (3571331)

National Dental Icon Program (Ikon Gigi - iGG): Module 2 (2020 Edition) by Maryam Binti Haji Abdul Halim (20249544)

“…This program, spearheaded by the Ministry of Health Malaysia, leverages community empowerment and volunteerism to address gaps in oral health education and promotion, especially in underserved areas.</p><p dir="ltr">Module 2 builds on the foundational principles of iGG by focusing on advanced strategies to scale the program, enhance volunteer capabilities, and integrate oral health promotion into broader public health services. …”

Spatial information is significantly decreased in dCA1 and vCA1 in APP/PS1 mice. by Udaysankar Chockanathan (18510288)

“…The spatial information in dCA1 was significantly larger than circularly shuffled spike trains with similar mean firing rates for C57BL/6 mice (mean ± std: empirical = 0.132 ± 0.048, shuffled = 0.124 ± 0.035, p < 0.001, two-sided Wilcoxon rank-sum test, n_empirical = 305 units from 5 recording sessions, n_shuffled = 30500 simulated units from 5 recording sessions), but not for APP/PS1 mice (mean ± std: empirical = 0.128 ± 0.051, shuffled = 0.123 ± .047, p = 0.39, two-sided Wilcoxon rank-sum test, n_empirical = 180 units from 4 recording sessions, n_shuffled = 18000 simulated units from 4 recording sessions). …”

Image 4_Improving gene editing of CRISPR/Cas9 using the callus-specific promoter pYCE1 in cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz).tif by Yuanchao Li (1560628)

“…In single-gene editing, the mutation rate was significantly increased, which reached an overall mutation rate of 95.24% and a homozygous mutation rate of 52.38%, compared with 62.07% and 37.93% with the 35S promoter, respectively. …”

Image 2_Improving gene editing of CRISPR/Cas9 using the callus-specific promoter pYCE1 in cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz).tif by Yuanchao Li (1560628)

“…In single-gene editing, the mutation rate was significantly increased, which reached an overall mutation rate of 95.24% and a homozygous mutation rate of 52.38%, compared with 62.07% and 37.93% with the 35S promoter, respectively. …”

Data Sheet 1_Improving gene editing of CRISPR/Cas9 using the callus-specific promoter pYCE1 in cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz).docx by Yuanchao Li (1560628)

“…In single-gene editing, the mutation rate was significantly increased, which reached an overall mutation rate of 95.24% and a homozygous mutation rate of 52.38%, compared with 62.07% and 37.93% with the 35S promoter, respectively. …”

Table 1_Improving gene editing of CRISPR/Cas9 using the callus-specific promoter pYCE1 in cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz).xlsx by Yuanchao Li (1560628)

“…In single-gene editing, the mutation rate was significantly increased, which reached an overall mutation rate of 95.24% and a homozygous mutation rate of 52.38%, compared with 62.07% and 37.93% with the 35S promoter, respectively. …”

Image 1_Improving gene editing of CRISPR/Cas9 using the callus-specific promoter pYCE1 in cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz).tif by Yuanchao Li (1560628)

“…In single-gene editing, the mutation rate was significantly increased, which reached an overall mutation rate of 95.24% and a homozygous mutation rate of 52.38%, compared with 62.07% and 37.93% with the 35S promoter, respectively. …”

Image 3_Improving gene editing of CRISPR/Cas9 using the callus-specific promoter pYCE1 in cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz).tif by Yuanchao Li (1560628)

“…In single-gene editing, the mutation rate was significantly increased, which reached an overall mutation rate of 95.24% and a homozygous mutation rate of 52.38%, compared with 62.07% and 37.93% with the 35S promoter, respectively. …”

Talvez scoring of AvrXa7, PthXo3 and TalF target EBES in the edited <i>OsSWEET14</i> promoter allele sequences. by Phuong Nguyen Duy (11414117)

Dose- and time-dependent effect of IFN-γ and TNF-α on benzamil-sensitive <i>I</i>_sc and TEER in HBECs. by Anusree Sasidharan (19226521)

Example of predicted effects of choice bundling on preference for larger, later rewards (LLRs) over smaller, sooner rewards (SSRs). by Jeffrey S. Stein (11689918)

Sequence editing alters the functional profile of gene activation by SKN-1A. by Briar Jochim (19106621)

LARP3 promotes the proliferation of HepG-2 and Li-7 cells. by Lin Zhu (192179)