Search alternatives:
significantly weaker » significantly greater (Expand Search), significantly better (Expand Search), significantly related (Expand Search)
larger increases » large increases (Expand Search), marked increases (Expand Search), largest decreases (Expand Search)
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
weaker decrease » greater decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search), water decreases (Expand Search)
significantly weaker » significantly greater (Expand Search), significantly better (Expand Search), significantly related (Expand Search)
larger increases » large increases (Expand Search), marked increases (Expand Search), largest decreases (Expand Search)
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
weaker decrease » greater decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search), water decreases (Expand Search)
-
41
-
42
-
43
-
44
-
45
-
46
Summary of studies evaluating associations between genetic variations of HLA and glioma development.
Published 2021Subjects: -
47
Genetic influence of HLA 2 and 3 locus haplotypes in glioblastoma patients.
Published 2021Subjects: -
48
-
49
-
50
-
51
-
52
-
53
-
54
DataSheet_1_The extremely small body size of Williamson’s mouse deer (Tragulus williamsoni) allows coexistence with sympatric larger ungulates through temporal avoidance.zip
Published 2023“…In this study, we assessed the competitive interactions of Williamson’s mouse deer (Tragulus williamsoni), an endangered species and one of the smallest ungulates in the world, with sympatric larger ungulates. We hypothesized that: 1) because of its extremely small body size, competition with the larger ungulates would be relatively weak, allowing spatial co-existence but still requiring temporal avoidance, and 2) the strength of avoidance would increases with decreasing differences in body size. …”
-
55
-
56
-
57
-
58
Spatial information is significantly decreased in dCA1 and vCA1 in APP/PS1 mice.
Published 2024“…The spatial information in dCA1 was significantly larger than circularly shuffled spike trains with similar mean firing rates for C57BL/6 mice (mean ± std: empirical = 0.132 ± 0.048, shuffled = 0.124 ± 0.035, p < 0.001, two-sided Wilcoxon rank-sum test, n<sub>empirical</sub> = 305 units from 5 recording sessions, n<sub>shuffled</sub> = 30500 simulated units from 5 recording sessions), but not for APP/PS1 mice (mean ± std: empirical = 0.128 ± 0.051, shuffled = 0.123 ± .047, p = 0.39, two-sided Wilcoxon rank-sum test, n<sub>empirical</sub> = 180 units from 4 recording sessions, n<sub>shuffled</sub> = 18000 simulated units from 4 recording sessions). …”
-
59
-
60