Stability differences between condition 1 and other conditions across participants on the hemiparetic (HP) side. حسب Hyung Suk Yang (20442438)

الموضوعات:

Periodic Open Cellular Structures with Streamlined Elliptical Struts for the Intensification of Mass Transfer-Limited Catalytic Reactors حسب Claudio Ferroni (10972436)

الموضوعات:

Flow diagram of different experiments and the study process. حسب Omid Mehrpour (9385929)

الموضوعات:

Histological scoring system of burned dermis. حسب Omid Mehrpour (9385929)

الموضوعات:

The mean scores of epidermis and dermis healing processes in burned rats after 10 and 21 days treatment with silver sulfadiazine 1% (silver), opium 0.05% (OP 0.05%), opium 0.5% (OP... حسب Omid Mehrpour (9385929)

الموضوعات:

The representative histological images of rat deep partial-thickness burns after 10 and 21 days of treatment with silver sulfadiazine 1% (SSD), opium 0.05% (OP0.05%), opium 0.5% (O... حسب Omid Mehrpour (9385929)

الموضوعات:

The concentration of inflammatory parameters (TNF-α and IL-10) in serum (a and b) and burned skin samples (c) of different experimental groups on day 2 and 10. حسب Omid Mehrpour (9385929)

الموضوعات:

The wound appearance of different groups during the period of study (a) and the percentage of wound reduction in treated groups on different days (b). حسب Omid Mehrpour (9385929)

الموضوعات:

Serum concentrations of malondialdehyde (a) and super oxide dismutase (b) and NOx (nitrate +nitrite) (c) in different experimental groups on day 2 and 10. حسب Omid Mehrpour (9385929)

الموضوعات:

Histological scoring system of burned epidermis. حسب Omid Mehrpour (9385929)

الموضوعات:

The concentrations of malondialdehyde (a), super oxide dismutase (b), and NOx (nitrate +nitrite)(c) in the burned skin samples of different experimental groups on day 2 and 10. حسب Omid Mehrpour (9385929)

الموضوعات:

Renal (urea and creatinine) (a, b) and Liver function (ALT and AST) (c, d) test in serums of different experimental groups and body weight changes (e) on day 10. حسب Omid Mehrpour (9385929)

الموضوعات:

Preference for the EIA – conjoint results. حسب Mehdi Mourali (10170245)

"…When are individuals more likely to support equal treatment algorithms (ETAs), characterized by higher predictive accuracy, and when do they prefer equal impact algorithms (EIAs) that reduce performance gaps between groups? A randomized conjoint experiment and a follow-up choice experiment revealed that support for the EIAs decreased sharply as their accuracy gap grew, although impact parity was prioritized more when ETAs produced large outcome discrepancies. …"

Marginal means – Pooled across scenarios. حسب Mehdi Mourali (10170245)

"…When are individuals more likely to support equal treatment algorithms (ETAs), characterized by higher predictive accuracy, and when do they prefer equal impact algorithms (EIAs) that reduce performance gaps between groups? A randomized conjoint experiment and a follow-up choice experiment revealed that support for the EIAs decreased sharply as their accuracy gap grew, although impact parity was prioritized more when ETAs produced large outcome discrepancies. …"

Sample attribute table. حسب Mehdi Mourali (10170245)

"…When are individuals more likely to support equal treatment algorithms (ETAs), characterized by higher predictive accuracy, and when do they prefer equal impact algorithms (EIAs) that reduce performance gaps between groups? A randomized conjoint experiment and a follow-up choice experiment revealed that support for the EIAs decreased sharply as their accuracy gap grew, although impact parity was prioritized more when ETAs produced large outcome discrepancies. …"

Subgroup analysis – Political affiliation. حسب Mehdi Mourali (10170245)

"…When are individuals more likely to support equal treatment algorithms (ETAs), characterized by higher predictive accuracy, and when do they prefer equal impact algorithms (EIAs) that reduce performance gaps between groups? A randomized conjoint experiment and a follow-up choice experiment revealed that support for the EIAs decreased sharply as their accuracy gap grew, although impact parity was prioritized more when ETAs produced large outcome discrepancies. …"

Sample scenario description. حسب Mehdi Mourali (10170245)

"…When are individuals more likely to support equal treatment algorithms (ETAs), characterized by higher predictive accuracy, and when do they prefer equal impact algorithms (EIAs) that reduce performance gaps between groups? A randomized conjoint experiment and a follow-up choice experiment revealed that support for the EIAs decreased sharply as their accuracy gap grew, although impact parity was prioritized more when ETAs produced large outcome discrepancies. …"

AMCEs – Pooled across scenarios. حسب Mehdi Mourali (10170245)

"…When are individuals more likely to support equal treatment algorithms (ETAs), characterized by higher predictive accuracy, and when do they prefer equal impact algorithms (EIAs) that reduce performance gaps between groups? A randomized conjoint experiment and a follow-up choice experiment revealed that support for the EIAs decreased sharply as their accuracy gap grew, although impact parity was prioritized more when ETAs produced large outcome discrepancies. …"

Methodological flowchart. حسب Mehdi Mourali (10170245)

"…When are individuals more likely to support equal treatment algorithms (ETAs), characterized by higher predictive accuracy, and when do they prefer equal impact algorithms (EIAs) that reduce performance gaps between groups? A randomized conjoint experiment and a follow-up choice experiment revealed that support for the EIAs decreased sharply as their accuracy gap grew, although impact parity was prioritized more when ETAs produced large outcome discrepancies. …"

Preference for the EIA vs. ETA across scenarios. حسب Mehdi Mourali (10170245)

"…When are individuals more likely to support equal treatment algorithms (ETAs), characterized by higher predictive accuracy, and when do they prefer equal impact algorithms (EIAs) that reduce performance gaps between groups? A randomized conjoint experiment and a follow-up choice experiment revealed that support for the EIAs decreased sharply as their accuracy gap grew, although impact parity was prioritized more when ETAs produced large outcome discrepancies. …"