The Vancouver Scar Scale. by Na Wang (193263)

“…</p><p>Results</p><p>We found that numerical rating scale(NRS) score and incidence of breast fistula in group A were significantly lower than other, the continuous decrease of postoperative drainage in group A was higher than other, there were significant differences among groups (p<0.001). …”

S1 Dataset - by Na Wang (193263)

“…</p><p>Results</p><p>We found that numerical rating scale(NRS) score and incidence of breast fistula in group A were significantly lower than other, the continuous decrease of postoperative drainage in group A was higher than other, there were significant differences among groups (p<0.001). …”

Numerical Rating Scale (NRS). by Na Wang (193263)

“…</p><p>Results</p><p>We found that numerical rating scale(NRS) score and incidence of breast fistula in group A were significantly lower than other, the continuous decrease of postoperative drainage in group A was higher than other, there were significant differences among groups (p<0.001). …”

Mammary fistula (n(%)). by Na Wang (193263)

“…</p><p>Results</p><p>We found that numerical rating scale(NRS) score and incidence of breast fistula in group A were significantly lower than other, the continuous decrease of postoperative drainage in group A was higher than other, there were significant differences among groups (p<0.001). …”

Forest maps affecting lactation outcomes. by Na Wang (193263)

“…</p><p>Results</p><p>We found that numerical rating scale(NRS) score and incidence of breast fistula in group A were significantly lower than other, the continuous decrease of postoperative drainage in group A was higher than other, there were significant differences among groups (p<0.001). …”

Postoperative drainage(ml) (M(IQR)). by Na Wang (193263)

“…</p><p>Results</p><p>We found that numerical rating scale(NRS) score and incidence of breast fistula in group A were significantly lower than other, the continuous decrease of postoperative drainage in group A was higher than other, there were significant differences among groups (p<0.001). …”

Data. by Su Hwan Park (15158181)

“…Participants in the progression group were younger (60.7 vs. 65.7 years, P = 0.015) and showed a larger BCVA change (0.20 vs. 0.04, P < 0.001) and greater ERM area decrease (34.2% vs. 11.7%, P < 0.001) during the follow-up period. …”

Fractal dimension fitted curves for different sandstones. by Dong Feng (5375471)

Subjects:

Relationships of different sandstones with the average porosity and average permeability in the study area. by Dong Feng (5375471)

Subjects:

Pore size distribution of different sandstone. by Dong Feng (5375471)

Subjects:

Experimental flow chart. by Dong Feng (5375471)

Subjects:

Sampling location diagram. by Dong Feng (5375471)

Subjects:

Principle of MNR. by Dong Feng (5375471)

Subjects:

Effect mechanism of weathered on porosity of sandstone. by Dong Feng (5375471)

Subjects:

Correlation between the sandstone mineral composition and fractal dimension. by Dong Feng (5375471)

Subjects:

Electron microscope scanning of different sandstone samples. by Dong Feng (5375471)

Subjects:

Comparative classification and characterisation of weathered levels. by Dong Feng (5375471)

Subjects:

Pore volume distribution of different pore sizes in each lithology. by Dong Feng (5375471)

Subjects:

Rock physical parameters of the samples. by Dong Feng (5375471)

Subjects:

XRD of unweathered and weathered sandstones. by Dong Feng (5375471)

Subjects: