Showing 121 - 140 results of 7,142 for search '(( significantly ((largest decrease) OR (linear decrease)) ) OR ( significant we decrease ))', query time: 0.38s Refine Results
  1. 121
  2. 122
  3. 123

    BMI groups by SES. by Krystal Hunter (6820052)

    Published 2025
    “…This relationship was not found in higher economic status women. Our study had two significant findings. We first found an obesity paradox in PTB for those mothers who are LSES. …”
  4. 124

    BMISES_Data_Part2. by Krystal Hunter (6820052)

    Published 2025
    “…This relationship was not found in higher economic status women. Our study had two significant findings. We first found an obesity paradox in PTB for those mothers who are LSES. …”
  5. 125

    Logistic regression for LSES population. by Krystal Hunter (6820052)

    Published 2025
    “…This relationship was not found in higher economic status women. Our study had two significant findings. We first found an obesity paradox in PTB for those mothers who are LSES. …”
  6. 126

    Logistic regression for HSES population. by Krystal Hunter (6820052)

    Published 2025
    “…This relationship was not found in higher economic status women. Our study had two significant findings. We first found an obesity paradox in PTB for those mothers who are LSES. …”
  7. 127

    Logistic regression for overall population. by Krystal Hunter (6820052)

    Published 2025
    “…This relationship was not found in higher economic status women. Our study had two significant findings. We first found an obesity paradox in PTB for those mothers who are LSES. …”
  8. 128

    BMISES_Data_Part1. by Krystal Hunter (6820052)

    Published 2025
    “…This relationship was not found in higher economic status women. Our study had two significant findings. We first found an obesity paradox in PTB for those mothers who are LSES. …”
  9. 129

    Baseline characteristics of HSES/LSES population. by Krystal Hunter (6820052)

    Published 2025
    “…This relationship was not found in higher economic status women. Our study had two significant findings. We first found an obesity paradox in PTB for those mothers who are LSES. …”
  10. 130

    Baseline characteristics of overall population. by Krystal Hunter (6820052)

    Published 2025
    “…This relationship was not found in higher economic status women. Our study had two significant findings. We first found an obesity paradox in PTB for those mothers who are LSES. …”
  11. 131

    Diagram of study population. by Krystal Hunter (6820052)

    Published 2025
    “…This relationship was not found in higher economic status women. Our study had two significant findings. We first found an obesity paradox in PTB for those mothers who are LSES. …”
  12. 132

    Study-related adverse events. by Benjamin R. Lewis (22279166)

    Published 2025
    “…In a linear mixed model analysis (LMM), the MBSR + PAP arm evidenced a significantly larger decrease in QIDS-SR-16 score than the MBSR-only arm from baseline to 2-weeks post-intervention (between-groups effect = 4.6, 95% CI [1.51, 7.70]; <i>p</i> = 0.008). …”
  13. 133

    Study flow chart. by Benjamin R. Lewis (22279166)

    Published 2025
    “…In a linear mixed model analysis (LMM), the MBSR + PAP arm evidenced a significantly larger decrease in QIDS-SR-16 score than the MBSR-only arm from baseline to 2-weeks post-intervention (between-groups effect = 4.6, 95% CI [1.51, 7.70]; <i>p</i> = 0.008). …”
  14. 134

    Study CONSORT diagram. by Benjamin R. Lewis (22279166)

    Published 2025
    “…In a linear mixed model analysis (LMM), the MBSR + PAP arm evidenced a significantly larger decrease in QIDS-SR-16 score than the MBSR-only arm from baseline to 2-weeks post-intervention (between-groups effect = 4.6, 95% CI [1.51, 7.70]; <i>p</i> = 0.008). …”
  15. 135
  16. 136

    Design of the D-trial. by Torsten Schober (20485754)

    Published 2024
    “…An increase in PD led to a linear decrease in inflorescence yield per plant (<i>p</i> = 0.02), whereas a positive linear relationship was found for inflorescence yield (<i>p</i> = 0.0001) and CBD yield (<i>p</i> = 0.0002) per m<sup>2</sup>. …”
  17. 137

    Estimated mean values for light interception. by Torsten Schober (20485754)

    Published 2024
    “…An increase in PD led to a linear decrease in inflorescence yield per plant (<i>p</i> = 0.02), whereas a positive linear relationship was found for inflorescence yield (<i>p</i> = 0.0001) and CBD yield (<i>p</i> = 0.0002) per m<sup>2</sup>. …”
  18. 138

    Raw data V-trial. by Torsten Schober (20485754)

    Published 2024
    “…An increase in PD led to a linear decrease in inflorescence yield per plant (<i>p</i> = 0.02), whereas a positive linear relationship was found for inflorescence yield (<i>p</i> = 0.0001) and CBD yield (<i>p</i> = 0.0002) per m<sup>2</sup>. …”
  19. 139

    Raw data D-trial. by Torsten Schober (20485754)

    Published 2024
    “…An increase in PD led to a linear decrease in inflorescence yield per plant (<i>p</i> = 0.02), whereas a positive linear relationship was found for inflorescence yield (<i>p</i> = 0.0001) and CBD yield (<i>p</i> = 0.0002) per m<sup>2</sup>. …”
  20. 140