Search alternatives:
largest decrease » larger decrease (Expand Search), marked decrease (Expand Search)
linear decrease » linear increase (Expand Search)
significant we » significant i.e (Expand Search), significant _ (Expand Search), significant co (Expand Search)
we decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search)
largest decrease » larger decrease (Expand Search), marked decrease (Expand Search)
linear decrease » linear increase (Expand Search)
significant we » significant i.e (Expand Search), significant _ (Expand Search), significant co (Expand Search)
we decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search)
-
121
-
122
-
123
BMI groups by SES.
Published 2025“…This relationship was not found in higher economic status women. Our study had two significant findings. We first found an obesity paradox in PTB for those mothers who are LSES. …”
-
124
BMISES_Data_Part2.
Published 2025“…This relationship was not found in higher economic status women. Our study had two significant findings. We first found an obesity paradox in PTB for those mothers who are LSES. …”
-
125
Logistic regression for LSES population.
Published 2025“…This relationship was not found in higher economic status women. Our study had two significant findings. We first found an obesity paradox in PTB for those mothers who are LSES. …”
-
126
Logistic regression for HSES population.
Published 2025“…This relationship was not found in higher economic status women. Our study had two significant findings. We first found an obesity paradox in PTB for those mothers who are LSES. …”
-
127
Logistic regression for overall population.
Published 2025“…This relationship was not found in higher economic status women. Our study had two significant findings. We first found an obesity paradox in PTB for those mothers who are LSES. …”
-
128
BMISES_Data_Part1.
Published 2025“…This relationship was not found in higher economic status women. Our study had two significant findings. We first found an obesity paradox in PTB for those mothers who are LSES. …”
-
129
Baseline characteristics of HSES/LSES population.
Published 2025“…This relationship was not found in higher economic status women. Our study had two significant findings. We first found an obesity paradox in PTB for those mothers who are LSES. …”
-
130
Baseline characteristics of overall population.
Published 2025“…This relationship was not found in higher economic status women. Our study had two significant findings. We first found an obesity paradox in PTB for those mothers who are LSES. …”
-
131
Diagram of study population.
Published 2025“…This relationship was not found in higher economic status women. Our study had two significant findings. We first found an obesity paradox in PTB for those mothers who are LSES. …”
-
132
Study-related adverse events.
Published 2025“…In a linear mixed model analysis (LMM), the MBSR + PAP arm evidenced a significantly larger decrease in QIDS-SR-16 score than the MBSR-only arm from baseline to 2-weeks post-intervention (between-groups effect = 4.6, 95% CI [1.51, 7.70]; <i>p</i> = 0.008). …”
-
133
Study flow chart.
Published 2025“…In a linear mixed model analysis (LMM), the MBSR + PAP arm evidenced a significantly larger decrease in QIDS-SR-16 score than the MBSR-only arm from baseline to 2-weeks post-intervention (between-groups effect = 4.6, 95% CI [1.51, 7.70]; <i>p</i> = 0.008). …”
-
134
Study CONSORT diagram.
Published 2025“…In a linear mixed model analysis (LMM), the MBSR + PAP arm evidenced a significantly larger decrease in QIDS-SR-16 score than the MBSR-only arm from baseline to 2-weeks post-intervention (between-groups effect = 4.6, 95% CI [1.51, 7.70]; <i>p</i> = 0.008). …”
-
135
-
136
Design of the D-trial.
Published 2024“…An increase in PD led to a linear decrease in inflorescence yield per plant (<i>p</i> = 0.02), whereas a positive linear relationship was found for inflorescence yield (<i>p</i> = 0.0001) and CBD yield (<i>p</i> = 0.0002) per m<sup>2</sup>. …”
-
137
Estimated mean values for light interception.
Published 2024“…An increase in PD led to a linear decrease in inflorescence yield per plant (<i>p</i> = 0.02), whereas a positive linear relationship was found for inflorescence yield (<i>p</i> = 0.0001) and CBD yield (<i>p</i> = 0.0002) per m<sup>2</sup>. …”
-
138
Raw data V-trial.
Published 2024“…An increase in PD led to a linear decrease in inflorescence yield per plant (<i>p</i> = 0.02), whereas a positive linear relationship was found for inflorescence yield (<i>p</i> = 0.0001) and CBD yield (<i>p</i> = 0.0002) per m<sup>2</sup>. …”
-
139
Raw data D-trial.
Published 2024“…An increase in PD led to a linear decrease in inflorescence yield per plant (<i>p</i> = 0.02), whereas a positive linear relationship was found for inflorescence yield (<i>p</i> = 0.0001) and CBD yield (<i>p</i> = 0.0002) per m<sup>2</sup>. …”
-
140