Search alternatives:
significantly high » significantly higher (Expand Search), significantly less (Expand Search), significantly changed (Expand Search)
less decrease » mean decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search), levels decreased (Expand Search)
high decrease » slight decrease (Expand Search), high degree (Expand Search), high disease (Expand Search)
we decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search)
significantly high » significantly higher (Expand Search), significantly less (Expand Search), significantly changed (Expand Search)
less decrease » mean decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search), levels decreased (Expand Search)
high decrease » slight decrease (Expand Search), high degree (Expand Search), high disease (Expand Search)
we decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search)
-
161
-
162
-
163
-
164
Flow diagram of the study.
Published 2023“…The SOFA score on POD 5 was significantly higher in the High-decrease group compared with the Low-decrease group (5.2 ± 2.6 vs. 4.1 ± 2.3; mean difference: 1.1, 95% CI: 0.3 to 1.8; P = 0.005). …”
-
165
Baseline characteristics of patients.
Published 2023“…The SOFA score on POD 5 was significantly higher in the High-decrease group compared with the Low-decrease group (5.2 ± 2.6 vs. 4.1 ± 2.3; mean difference: 1.1, 95% CI: 0.3 to 1.8; P = 0.005). …”
-
166
-
167
-
168
-
169
Modeling the relationship between cancer level in hemolymph and MarBTN in tank eDNA.
Published 2025Subjects: -
170
-
171
-
172
-
173
-
174
-
175
-
176
-
177
Binomial logistic regression odds ratios of all patient, CDT, and outcome variables (n = 5,962).
Published 2023Subjects: -
178
-
179
-
180