Comparison of MAP@0.5 results from experiments. by Junyan Wang (4738518)

Subjects:

YOLO11. by Junyan Wang (4738518)

Subjects:

Structure of the SCI-YOLO11 network. by Junyan Wang (4738518)

Subjects:

Comparative experimental results. by Junyan Wang (4738518)

Subjects:

Algorithm operation steps. by Junyan Wang (4738518)

Subjects:

SCI-YOLO11. by Junyan Wang (4738518)

Subjects:

Dataset for insulator defect detection. by Junyan Wang (4738518)

Subjects:

YOLOV8. by Junyan Wang (4738518)

Subjects:

Faster-RCNN. by Junyan Wang (4738518)

Subjects:

Results of ablation experiments. by Junyan Wang (4738518)

Subjects:

Structure diagram of SPDConv. by Junyan Wang (4738518)

Subjects:

Wise-IOU regression diagram. by Junyan Wang (4738518)

Subjects:

Visualization of detection results. by Junyan Wang (4738518)

Subjects:

Structure diagram of the SE attention mechanism. by Junyan Wang (4738518)

Subjects:

Results of significance for regression factors. by Junxia Zhou (14381598)

“…Micro-cracks appeared in the cemented body by Day 7, resulting in a slight decrease in strength (3.92%) from Day 3 to Day 7. The formation of well-developed needle-like AFt, C-(A)S-H gel, and small-volume plate-like CH contributed to uniform cementation and a denser structure. …”

Decreased clonogenic capacity of U87MG and U251MG glioma cells dependent on SHG-44 concentration. by Denis Mustafov (19137870)

Statistically Significant Results for Heart Rate Variability (HRV) Indices for High and Low Authority Groups. by David Vagni (8060432)

Subjects:

Statistically Significant Results for Heart Rate Variability (HRV) Indices for High and Low Clarity Groups. by David Vagni (8060432)

Subjects:

a-d. Difference in (a) probing depth; (b) clinical attachment level; (c) bleeding on probing, and (d) plaque index values between baseline and six months after treatment using syst... by Iva Milinkovic (22331710)

<b>Nest mass in forest tits </b><b><i>Paridae</i></b><b> </b><b>increases with elevation and decreasing body mass, promoting reproductive success</b> by Clara Wild (19246606)

“…Nest boxes were installed along an elevational gradient of approximately 1000 m a.sl., either in forest gaps with fluctuating microclimatic conditions or in closed forests with buffered microclimates. We found that nest mass increased by ~ 60% along the elevational gradient, but the effect of canopy openness on nest mass was not significant, while nest mass decreased along the ranked species from the smallest <i>Periparus ater</i> to the medium-sized <i>Cyanistes caeruleus</i> and the largest <i>Parus major</i>. …”