Search alternatives:
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
linear decrease » linear increase (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
linear decrease » linear increase (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
-
81
Distribution of responses to vital signs.
Published 2025“…A strong negative correlation was present between barriers and confidence. …”
-
82
Survey tool development process.
Published 2025“…A strong negative correlation was present between barriers and confidence. …”
-
83
Respondent characteristics.
Published 2025“…A strong negative correlation was present between barriers and confidence. …”
-
84
DDC for four anticoagulants from 2019 to 2023.
Published 2025“…The trends in the utilization and expenditure of anticoagulants were examined using linear regression analysis.</p><p>Results</p><p>From 2019 to 2023, the DDDs of rivaroxaban demonstrated a significant annual increase in most hospitals (<i>p</i> < 0.05). …”
-
85
Sensory-evoked potentials of N80 and N150.
Published 2024“…The tDCS group demonstrated a significant decrease in AMT of MF and TrA/IO muscles (P < 0.05) and an increase in N80 amplitude (P = 0.027), with no significant changes in the control group. …”
-
86
-
87
-
88
-
89
Volitional control frequency and intensity in VH (Kapsner-Smith et al., 2025)
Published 2025“…Group differences were tested with general linear models.</p><p dir="ltr"><b>Results: </b>No significant differences were found between people with and without HVDs on any of the measures. …”
-
90
-
91
-
92
-
93
-
94
-
95
COVID19 effect on essential services.
Published 2024“…The difference in the trends of services before and during COVID-19 was compared using linear-by-linear tests and the difference of magnitude across the indicators was compared using Autoregressive Integrated Moving Average (ARIMA) interrupted time series analysis at a 5% significance level.…”
-
96
-
97
Subgroup analysis of AIP and depression.
Published 2025“…When AIP > 0.60, premenopausal women had an increased risk of depression, while postmenopausal women had a decreased risk of depression.</p><p>Conclusions</p><p>This study demonstrates that elevated AIP levels are significantly associated with an increased risk of depression in both premenopausal and postmenopausal women. …”
-
98
-
99
Changes in alpha diversity in the weeks before anti-TNF-a treatment.
Published 2024“…The analysis found a significant association across all subjects for Shannon diversity with decreasing diversity in the lead up to the next treatment (lmer model, beta = -0.018, <i>p</i> = 0.036) and no association for observed diversity (<i>p</i>>0.1). …”
-
100