Search alternatives:
greater decrease » greatest decrease (Expand Search), greater increase (Expand Search), greater disease (Expand Search)
linear decrease » linear increase (Expand Search)
significant all » significant anti (Expand Search), significant gap (Expand Search), significant _ (Expand Search)
all decrease » small decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), fold decrease (Expand Search)
greater decrease » greatest decrease (Expand Search), greater increase (Expand Search), greater disease (Expand Search)
linear decrease » linear increase (Expand Search)
significant all » significant anti (Expand Search), significant gap (Expand Search), significant _ (Expand Search)
all decrease » small decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), fold decrease (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
-
5
Trend of specific mental health disorders for all services utilization between 2016 and 2022.
Published 2024Subjects: -
6
-
7
-
8
-
9
-
10
Summary map of all contacts with statistically significant SVM classifications.
Published 2024“…<p>The top row presents the proportion of significant SVM clusters. It illustrates what proportions of channels are significant at that time-frequency ranging from 0 to 1. …”
-
11
-
12
Summary of the effect of MPDD on SDLP across all participants, and also participants categorized by driving styles (“NS” (no significant), “+” (significant increase), and “-” (significant decrease)).
Published 2025“…<p>Summary of the effect of MPDD on SDLP across all participants, and also participants categorized by driving styles (“NS” (no significant), “+” (significant increase), and “-” (significant decrease)).…”
-
13
RTs (in ms, bars) and ACC (in %, line) across all tasks, with 95% confidence interval.
Published 2024Subjects: -
14
Summary of the effect of MPDD on ART and TIBL across all participants, and also participants categorized by driving styles (“NS” (no significant), “+” (significant increase), and “-” (significant decrease).
Published 2025“…<p>Summary of the effect of MPDD on ART and TIBL across all participants, and also participants categorized by driving styles (“NS” (no significant), “+” (significant increase), and “-” (significant decrease).…”
-
15
-
16
-
17
Rates of change in each retinal layer thickness, calculated using linear mixed models.
Published 2025Subjects: -
18
-
19
-
20