بدائل البحث:
greatest decrease » treatment decreased (توسيع البحث), greater increase (توسيع البحث)
linear decrease » linear increase (توسيع البحث)
significant non » significant gap (توسيع البحث), significant amount (توسيع البحث)
non decrease » nn decrease (توسيع البحث), point decrease (توسيع البحث), note decreased (توسيع البحث)
greatest decrease » treatment decreased (توسيع البحث), greater increase (توسيع البحث)
linear decrease » linear increase (توسيع البحث)
significant non » significant gap (توسيع البحث), significant amount (توسيع البحث)
non decrease » nn decrease (توسيع البحث), point decrease (توسيع البحث), note decreased (توسيع البحث)
-
121
-
122
-
123
-
124
-
125
-
126
AZ10606120 treatment significantly increased cytotoxicity and reduced cell number in a dose-dependent manner.
منشور في 2025"…Scale bars = 100µm <b>(f)</b> Dose-response relationship between AZ10606120 treatments and cell number in U251 cell cultures demonstrating that increasing AZ10606120 concentrations (0-50µM) correlated to decreasing cell number. This relationship was modelled using a non-linear least squares regression model for a sigmoidal curve. …"
-
127
-
128
-
129
-
130
-
131
Behaviour and significance of reservoir evaporation and seepage losses – an experience of four reservoirs in Damodar River Valley, India
منشور في 2025"…Both correlation and Nash–Sutcliffe efficiency values indicated satisfactory performance of the gauge-seepage model. During non-monsoon months, seepage and evaporation losses were significant, which indicated necessity of consideration of losses in water balance equation for estimation of inflow.…"
-
132
-
133
-
134
-
135
-
136
-
137
Annual treatment frequencies in recurrence and non-recurrence groups.
منشور في 2025"…<p>In the recurrence group, the respective treatment counts for anti-VEGF, STTA, MA-PC, PPV, and total treatments (mean ± standard deviation) in the year before surgery were 3.0 ± 1.4, 0.1 ± 0.3, 0.8 ± 1.0, 0.1 ± 0.3, and 4.0 ± 2.1, respectively. These significantly decreased to 2.3 ± 2.6, 0.1 ± 0.3, 0.8 ± 1.6, 0.0, and 3.1 ± 2.8 in the first year; 2.1 ± 2.8, 0.4 ± 1.0, 0, 0.1 ± 0.3, and 2.6 ± 2.8 in the second year; and 2.0 ± 2.2, 0, 0.6 ± 1.7, 0.1 ± 0.3, and 2.8 ± 3.5 in the third year (Kruskal–Wallis test, p < 0.001; Dunn’s test, *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01). …"
-
138
-
139
Results of significance for regression factors.
منشور في 2024"…BET and SEM analyses demonstrated that the specific surface area and porosity (most probable pore size) gradually decreased over time. At various ages, mesopores (cumulative pore diameter, median pore diameter) initially increased and then decreased. …"
-
140