Search alternatives:
significantly mean » significantly less (Expand Search), significantly mediate (Expand Search), significantly impact (Expand Search)
linear decrease » linear increase (Expand Search)
marked decrease » marked increase (Expand Search)
significantly mean » significantly less (Expand Search), significantly mediate (Expand Search), significantly impact (Expand Search)
linear decrease » linear increase (Expand Search)
marked decrease » marked increase (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
-
5
-
6
Table 1_Associations between the Dietary Inflammatory Index and depression among pregnant and postpartum women: analysis of NHANES 2005–2018.docx
Published 2025“…S., a higher Dietary Inflammatory Index was associated with a greater risk of depression, but this relationship was markedly non-linear. Diets with very high proinflammatory potential were linked to significantly increased odds of perinatal depression, whereas more anti-inflammatory diets did not result in a further decrease in depression risk below that threshold. …”
-
7
Table 1_Inflammatory parameters mediates the relationship between dietary index for gut microbiota and frailty in middle-aged and older adults in the United States: findings from a...
Published 2025“…RCS showed that the risk of frailty decreased linearly with increasing DI-GM levels. Mediation analysis indicated significant effects for leukocyte count, neutrophil count, NLR, and SIRI, with mediation proportions of 5.7, 7.9, 4.4, and 5.5%, respectively (all p < 0.001).…”
-
8
feature parameters
Published 2025“…<p dir="ltr">We evaluated seven eye‐movement features before and after fatigue using paired t‐tests on mean ± SD values. Sample Entropy on the X-axis decreased from 0.095 ± 0.054 to 0.080 ± 0.048 (p = 0.025) and on the Y-axis from 0.106 ± 0.046 to 0.090 ± 0.043 (p = 0.025), whereas Approximate Entropy and Cross Entropy showed no significant change. …”
-
9
Optimisation of read depth, DNA quantity, and unique alternate observation threshold.
Published 2025“…Variants with a prevalence of ≥ 10% within this cohort were excluded as likely sequencing artefacts, which excluded 10.5% of variants (D). The mean number of variants detected per sample above the standard CHIP threshold of ≥ 0.02 VAF increased linearly with subject age (E). …”