Search alternatives:
significant effect » significant impact (Expand Search)
linear decrease » linear increase (Expand Search)
effect decrease » effects decreased (Expand Search)
significant effect » significant impact (Expand Search)
linear decrease » linear increase (Expand Search)
effect decrease » effects decreased (Expand Search)
-
21
-
22
-
23
Study-related adverse events.
Published 2025“…We recorded 12 study-related, Grade 1–2 AEs and no serious AEs. In a linear mixed model analysis (LMM), the MBSR + PAP arm evidenced a significantly larger decrease in QIDS-SR-16 score than the MBSR-only arm from baseline to 2-weeks post-intervention (between-groups effect = 4.6, 95% CI [1.51, 7.70]; <i>p</i> = 0.008). …”
-
24
Study flow chart.
Published 2025“…We recorded 12 study-related, Grade 1–2 AEs and no serious AEs. In a linear mixed model analysis (LMM), the MBSR + PAP arm evidenced a significantly larger decrease in QIDS-SR-16 score than the MBSR-only arm from baseline to 2-weeks post-intervention (between-groups effect = 4.6, 95% CI [1.51, 7.70]; <i>p</i> = 0.008). …”
-
25
Study CONSORT diagram.
Published 2025“…We recorded 12 study-related, Grade 1–2 AEs and no serious AEs. In a linear mixed model analysis (LMM), the MBSR + PAP arm evidenced a significantly larger decrease in QIDS-SR-16 score than the MBSR-only arm from baseline to 2-weeks post-intervention (between-groups effect = 4.6, 95% CI [1.51, 7.70]; <i>p</i> = 0.008). …”
-
26
Mean parameter values for the selected crops.
Published 2025“…Multi-spectral band images from Landsat-8 satellite images of a chosen land are employed from USGS Earth Resources Observation and Science (EROS) Center for extracting indices that are used for agricultural analysis, determining the vegetation index, water index, and salinity index of that land using K-means. Furthermore, crop yield is predicted using Linear Regression and Random Forest, achieving accuracies of 93.49% and 95.87%, respectively, while using RMSE (Root Mean Squared Error) as the loss function. …”
-
27
-
28
-
29
-
30
Results of the LMM analysis for IOP change.
Published 2025“…The number of antiglaucoma medications was converted into glaucoma medication scores (GMS). Linear mixed model (LMM) analysis was performed by setting GMS and intraocular pressure (IOP) change as objective variables, and the postoperative days, preoperative mean deviation (MD), preoperative IOP, and various antiglaucoma medications as fixed effects. …”
-
31
Results of the LMM analysis for GMS change.
Published 2025“…The number of antiglaucoma medications was converted into glaucoma medication scores (GMS). Linear mixed model (LMM) analysis was performed by setting GMS and intraocular pressure (IOP) change as objective variables, and the postoperative days, preoperative mean deviation (MD), preoperative IOP, and various antiglaucoma medications as fixed effects. …”
-
32
Achieving Improved Ion Swarm Shaping Based on Ion Leakage Control in Ion Mobility Spectrometry
Published 2025“…Simulations and experiments demonstrate that precise voltage adjustments effectively minimize ion leakage, enhancing resolving power by 50% (reaching a maximum of 106), while the corresponding decrease in signal intensity follows the <i>I</i><sub>p</sub>–<i>R</i><sub>p</sub> linear relationship. …”
-
33
-
34
Flowchart of the study population.
Published 2025“…Among those 803 individuals who did not take antihypertensive medication, there was a significant association in linear regression between increase in PSS-10 and decrease in C2 (B: −0.2, 95% CI: −0.4- −0.02; p = 0.03) that was lost after adjustment for physical activity (B: −0.16, 95% CI: −0.35–0.03; p = 0.1). …”
-
35
Characteristics of study population.
Published 2025“…Among those 803 individuals who did not take antihypertensive medication, there was a significant association in linear regression between increase in PSS-10 and decrease in C2 (B: −0.2, 95% CI: −0.4- −0.02; p = 0.03) that was lost after adjustment for physical activity (B: −0.16, 95% CI: −0.35–0.03; p = 0.1). …”
-
36
-
37
-
38
-
39
-
40