Search alternatives:
significant shape » significant change (Expand Search), significant gap (Expand Search), significant side (Expand Search)
linear decrease » linear increase (Expand Search)
shape decrease » shape increases (Expand Search), small decrease (Expand Search), step decrease (Expand Search)
significant shape » significant change (Expand Search), significant gap (Expand Search), significant side (Expand Search)
linear decrease » linear increase (Expand Search)
shape decrease » shape increases (Expand Search), small decrease (Expand Search), step decrease (Expand Search)
-
1621
Form for machine recognition.
Published 2025“…Following model updates with measured data, the accumulated prediction error rapidly decreases. The proposed prediction method for shape errors during pushing exhibits high accuracy and versatility in similar projects, significantly reducing time spent on manual error handling and minimizing computational inaccuracies.…”
-
1622
RMSE versus architectural parameters.
Published 2025“…Following model updates with measured data, the accumulated prediction error rapidly decreases. The proposed prediction method for shape errors during pushing exhibits high accuracy and versatility in similar projects, significantly reducing time spent on manual error handling and minimizing computational inaccuracies.…”
-
1623
Kalman process.
Published 2025“…Following model updates with measured data, the accumulated prediction error rapidly decreases. The proposed prediction method for shape errors during pushing exhibits high accuracy and versatility in similar projects, significantly reducing time spent on manual error handling and minimizing computational inaccuracies.…”
-
1624
Attention mechanism.
Published 2025“…Following model updates with measured data, the accumulated prediction error rapidly decreases. The proposed prediction method for shape errors during pushing exhibits high accuracy and versatility in similar projects, significantly reducing time spent on manual error handling and minimizing computational inaccuracies.…”
-
1625
-
1626
-
1627
-
1628
-
1629
-
1630
-
1631
-
1632
-
1633
-
1634
Baseline characteristics of the study sample<sup>β</sup>μ.
Published 2024“…Pharmacists in Active Group A (37.2%) and Active Group B (32.3%) most commonly intervened by recommending the cessation of medication, while the most common intervention in the Control Group was recommending a decrease in dose (29.8%). The mean cost reduction per patient was highest in Active Group A (31.3 ±11.8 $), followed by Active Group B (20.8 ±8.6 $) and the Control Group (19.6 ±9.5 $). …”
-
1635
The flow diagram of the study (CONSORT, 2010).
Published 2024“…Pharmacists in Active Group A (37.2%) and Active Group B (32.3%) most commonly intervened by recommending the cessation of medication, while the most common intervention in the Control Group was recommending a decrease in dose (29.8%). The mean cost reduction per patient was highest in Active Group A (31.3 ±11.8 $), followed by Active Group B (20.8 ±8.6 $) and the Control Group (19.6 ±9.5 $). …”
-
1636
-
1637
-
1638
-
1639
-
1640
Data Sheet 1_Impact of multiple environmental factors on influenza–like illness in Fujian Province, China, 2015–2023: a multicity study.zip
Published 2025“…The NO₂–ILI association was non–linear, resembling an inverted “U” shape, with a risk peak at 40.5 μg/m<sup>3</sup>. …”