Showing 121 - 140 results of 6,774 for search '(( significantly ((linear decrease) OR (mean decrease)) ) OR ( significantly affect decrease ))', query time: 0.46s Refine Results
  1. 121
  2. 122
  3. 123
  4. 124
  5. 125
  6. 126
  7. 127
  8. 128
  9. 129
  10. 130
  11. 131

    Image1_Association between mental health and male fertility: depression, rather than anxiety, is linked to decreased semen quality.tif by Yi Zhang (9093)

    Published 2024
    “…</p>Results<p>Status of depression was negatively associated with semen quality parameters, whereas no statistically significant association was recognized between anxiety and semen quality except that sperm concentration was decreased by 25.60 (95% CI, 1.226 to 49.965, P=0.040) ×10<sup>6</sup>/ml in moderate to severe anxiety group referring to normal group. …”
  12. 132
  13. 133
  14. 134
  15. 135

    Study-related adverse events. by Benjamin R. Lewis (22279166)

    Published 2025
    “…We recorded 12 study-related, Grade 1–2 AEs and no serious AEs. In a linear mixed model analysis (LMM), the MBSR + PAP arm evidenced a significantly larger decrease in QIDS-SR-16 score than the MBSR-only arm from baseline to 2-weeks post-intervention (between-groups effect = 4.6, 95% CI [1.51, 7.70]; <i>p</i> = 0.008). …”
  16. 136

    Study flow chart. by Benjamin R. Lewis (22279166)

    Published 2025
    “…We recorded 12 study-related, Grade 1–2 AEs and no serious AEs. In a linear mixed model analysis (LMM), the MBSR + PAP arm evidenced a significantly larger decrease in QIDS-SR-16 score than the MBSR-only arm from baseline to 2-weeks post-intervention (between-groups effect = 4.6, 95% CI [1.51, 7.70]; <i>p</i> = 0.008). …”
  17. 137

    Study CONSORT diagram. by Benjamin R. Lewis (22279166)

    Published 2025
    “…We recorded 12 study-related, Grade 1–2 AEs and no serious AEs. In a linear mixed model analysis (LMM), the MBSR + PAP arm evidenced a significantly larger decrease in QIDS-SR-16 score than the MBSR-only arm from baseline to 2-weeks post-intervention (between-groups effect = 4.6, 95% CI [1.51, 7.70]; <i>p</i> = 0.008). …”
  18. 138
  19. 139
  20. 140