Search alternatives:
significantly decreased » significantly increased (Expand Search), significant decrease (Expand Search), significantly correlated (Expand Search)
linear decrease » linear increase (Expand Search)
mean decrease » a decrease (Expand Search)
significantly decreased » significantly increased (Expand Search), significant decrease (Expand Search), significantly correlated (Expand Search)
linear decrease » linear increase (Expand Search)
mean decrease » a decrease (Expand Search)
-
341
-
342
-
343
Relevant follow-up evaluation indicators after operation (mean±standard deviation)/n (%).
Published 2024Subjects: -
344
-
345
Y-27632 collaborated with BA to attenuate the increase in the integrity and decrease in the permeability of epithelial barrier injury induced by LPS in Caco2 monolayers.
Published 2024“…The values are expressed as the means ± SDs and were analyzed according to the variance of the factorial design. **, *** and ****denote <i>p</i> < 0.01, < 0.001 and < 0.0001, respectively; ns = not significant.…”
-
346
-
347
-
348
-
349
Estimated mean values for light interception.
Published 2024“…An increase in PD led to a linear decrease in inflorescence yield per plant (<i>p</i> = 0.02), whereas a positive linear relationship was found for inflorescence yield (<i>p</i> = 0.0001) and CBD yield (<i>p</i> = 0.0002) per m<sup>2</sup>. …”
-
350
-
351
-
352
Damage accumulation decreases elongation rates and displaces growth equilibrium.
Published 2019“…(A) Exposure to phototoxic damage led to decreasing elongation rates in all treatment levels (length of exposure, every 2 min: 70 ms, 700 ms, 1 s, 1.5 s, 3 s). …”
-
353
-
354
Identification of target genes impacted by the decreased Wnt signaling in the R595H mESCs.
Published 2023“…The quantifications in F and G represent the means (± SD) of three independent experiments. *<i>p</i> < 0.05; and n.s. not significant (<i>p</i> > 0.05) by one-way ANOVA. …”
-
355
-
356
-
357
-
358
-
359
-
360