Search alternatives:
significantly improved » significantly increased (Expand Search)
improved decrease » improved urease (Expand Search), marked decrease (Expand Search)
linear decrease » linear increase (Expand Search)
Showing 1 - 20 results of 29 for search '(( significantly ((linear decrease) OR (mean decrease)) ) OR ( significantly improved decrease ))~', query time: 0.37s Refine Results
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3

    Achieving Improved Ion Swarm Shaping Based on Ion Leakage Control in Ion Mobility Spectrometry by Jiyao Wang (2121157)

    Published 2025
    “…The preserved linearity means avoiding excessive ion loss and shape distortion, ultimately leading to optimal resolving power. …”
  4. 4

    Study-related adverse events. by Benjamin R. Lewis (22279166)

    Published 2025
    “…We recorded 12 study-related, Grade 1–2 AEs and no serious AEs. In a linear mixed model analysis (LMM), the MBSR + PAP arm evidenced a significantly larger decrease in QIDS-SR-16 score than the MBSR-only arm from baseline to 2-weeks post-intervention (between-groups effect = 4.6, 95% CI [1.51, 7.70]; <i>p</i> = 0.008). …”
  5. 5

    Study flow chart. by Benjamin R. Lewis (22279166)

    Published 2025
    “…We recorded 12 study-related, Grade 1–2 AEs and no serious AEs. In a linear mixed model analysis (LMM), the MBSR + PAP arm evidenced a significantly larger decrease in QIDS-SR-16 score than the MBSR-only arm from baseline to 2-weeks post-intervention (between-groups effect = 4.6, 95% CI [1.51, 7.70]; <i>p</i> = 0.008). …”
  6. 6

    Study CONSORT diagram. by Benjamin R. Lewis (22279166)

    Published 2025
    “…We recorded 12 study-related, Grade 1–2 AEs and no serious AEs. In a linear mixed model analysis (LMM), the MBSR + PAP arm evidenced a significantly larger decrease in QIDS-SR-16 score than the MBSR-only arm from baseline to 2-weeks post-intervention (between-groups effect = 4.6, 95% CI [1.51, 7.70]; <i>p</i> = 0.008). …”
  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. 9
  10. 10
  11. 11

    Predictors in ordinal regression model for GDS. by Shane Naidoo (20148021)

    Published 2025
    “…Conversely in a linear regression model, depression (<i>B</i> = -2.01, <i>p</i> = .004) and physical activity (<i>B</i> = -.001, <i>p</i> = .008) were predictors for decreases in BMI.…”
  12. 12

    Classification of hand grip strength. by Shane Naidoo (20148021)

    Published 2025
    “…Conversely in a linear regression model, depression (<i>B</i> = -2.01, <i>p</i> = .004) and physical activity (<i>B</i> = -.001, <i>p</i> = .008) were predictors for decreases in BMI.…”
  13. 13

    Rating scale for functional severity [28]. by Shane Naidoo (20148021)

    Published 2025
    “…Conversely in a linear regression model, depression (<i>B</i> = -2.01, <i>p</i> = .004) and physical activity (<i>B</i> = -.001, <i>p</i> = .008) were predictors for decreases in BMI.…”
  14. 14

    Regression model coefficients. by Shane Naidoo (20148021)

    Published 2025
    “…Conversely in a linear regression model, depression (<i>B</i> = -2.01, <i>p</i> = .004) and physical activity (<i>B</i> = -.001, <i>p</i> = .008) were predictors for decreases in BMI.…”
  15. 15

    ICOPE screening positive participant’s responses. by Shane Naidoo (20148021)

    Published 2025
    “…Conversely in a linear regression model, depression (<i>B</i> = -2.01, <i>p</i> = .004) and physical activity (<i>B</i> = -.001, <i>p</i> = .008) were predictors for decreases in BMI.…”
  16. 16

    WHO BMI classification for adults. by Shane Naidoo (20148021)

    Published 2025
    “…Conversely in a linear regression model, depression (<i>B</i> = -2.01, <i>p</i> = .004) and physical activity (<i>B</i> = -.001, <i>p</i> = .008) were predictors for decreases in BMI.…”
  17. 17

    Baseline characteristics of participants. by Mei Zhou (269746)

    Published 2025
    “…</p><p>Results</p><p>After DRG implementation, the logarithmic mean of total hospitalization expenditures decreased significantly (3.914 ± 0.837 vs. 3.872 ± 1.004), while rates of unplanned readmissions, unplanned reoperations, postoperative complications, and patient complaints within 30 days increased significantly (3.784% vs 4.214%, 0.083% vs 0.166%, 0.207% vs 0.258%, 3.741% vs 5.133%). …”
  18. 18

    The framework diagram of this study. by Mei Zhou (269746)

    Published 2025
    “…</p><p>Results</p><p>After DRG implementation, the logarithmic mean of total hospitalization expenditures decreased significantly (3.914 ± 0.837 vs. 3.872 ± 1.004), while rates of unplanned readmissions, unplanned reoperations, postoperative complications, and patient complaints within 30 days increased significantly (3.784% vs 4.214%, 0.083% vs 0.166%, 0.207% vs 0.258%, 3.741% vs 5.133%). …”
  19. 19

    Study sample. by Nipaporn Butsing (19470003)

    Published 2025
    “…The most significant improvement in functional outcomes occurred within one month post-discharge.…”
  20. 20

    SEAwise Report on improved predictive models of growth, production and stock quality under different habitat scenarios and incorporating experimental results by Leire Ibaibarriaga (13760979)

    Published 2025
    “…Summer temperature was not a significant driver of the individual growth. Mediated length-based growth models and linear mixed models applied to weight-at-age data of six stocks showed forecast potential for only one stock (sol.27.20-24). …”