Hydrate-Based Gas Storage Made Greener: Methane Hydrate Formation Enhancement with a Low-Toxicity Promoter by Katipot Inkong (7979942)

“…The results demonstrate that higher temperatures lead to lower gas uptake and slower hydrate formation kinetics, as increased temperature reduces heat distribution efficiency. …”

Hydrate-Based Gas Storage Made Greener: Methane Hydrate Formation Enhancement with a Low-Toxicity Promoter by Katipot Inkong (7979942)

“…The results demonstrate that higher temperatures lead to lower gas uptake and slower hydrate formation kinetics, as increased temperature reduces heat distribution efficiency. …”

Hydrate-Based Gas Storage Made Greener: Methane Hydrate Formation Enhancement with a Low-Toxicity Promoter by Katipot Inkong (7979942)

“…The results demonstrate that higher temperatures lead to lower gas uptake and slower hydrate formation kinetics, as increased temperature reduces heat distribution efficiency. …”

Hydrate-Based Gas Storage Made Greener: Methane Hydrate Formation Enhancement with a Low-Toxicity Promoter by Katipot Inkong (7979942)

“…The results demonstrate that higher temperatures lead to lower gas uptake and slower hydrate formation kinetics, as increased temperature reduces heat distribution efficiency. …”

Hydrate-Based Gas Storage Made Greener: Methane Hydrate Formation Enhancement with a Low-Toxicity Promoter by Katipot Inkong (7979942)

“…The results demonstrate that higher temperatures lead to lower gas uptake and slower hydrate formation kinetics, as increased temperature reduces heat distribution efficiency. …”

COP1/DET1 module promotes PIF4 autoinhibition. by Sreya Das (20531295)

Risk Illustration. by Iftikhar Ali Ch (20783753)

“…The binary regression model indicated that a higher BMI was associated with an increased risk of SCD (HR = 1.064, 95% CI: 1.012–1.118, p = 0.014). …”

Predictors of SCD. by Iftikhar Ali Ch (20783753)

“…The binary regression model indicated that a higher BMI was associated with an increased risk of SCD (HR = 1.064, 95% CI: 1.012–1.118, p = 0.014). …”

Clinical outcomes. by Iftikhar Ali Ch (20783753)

“…The binary regression model indicated that a higher BMI was associated with an increased risk of SCD (HR = 1.064, 95% CI: 1.012–1.118, p = 0.014). …”

Obesity and Depressed Ejection Fraction. by Iftikhar Ali Ch (20783753)

“…The binary regression model indicated that a higher BMI was associated with an increased risk of SCD (HR = 1.064, 95% CI: 1.012–1.118, p = 0.014). …”

Kaplan Meier curve. by Iftikhar Ali Ch (20783753)

“…The binary regression model indicated that a higher BMI was associated with an increased risk of SCD (HR = 1.064, 95% CI: 1.012–1.118, p = 0.014). …”

Overall view of the slurry. by Jiawei Fan (8822046)

“…The field experimental results illustrated that: (1) The bearing capacity of inclined steel grouting pipe with anchorage length of 9 m increases 22.6% compared with that of ordinary grouting pipe. (2) Anchorage length is not a significant influence factor for bearing capacity of inclined steel grouting pipes in loess embankment slope, while anchorage length is a significant influence factor for modulus of load-displacement curves of inclined steel grouting pipes in loess embankment slope. (3) Effective anchorage length of inclined steel grouting pipe in loess embankment slope will be slightly increased when increasing anchorage length, while the ratio of effective anchorage length to total anchorage length will be decreased when increasing anchorage length. (4) Inclined steel grouting pipe average cohesive strength along effective anchorage length section at the interface between cement grouting and soil stratum is at least three times compared with that of rock bolt.…”

Definitions of variables. by Jiawei Fan (8822046)

“…The field experimental results illustrated that: (1) The bearing capacity of inclined steel grouting pipe with anchorage length of 9 m increases 22.6% compared with that of ordinary grouting pipe. (2) Anchorage length is not a significant influence factor for bearing capacity of inclined steel grouting pipes in loess embankment slope, while anchorage length is a significant influence factor for modulus of load-displacement curves of inclined steel grouting pipes in loess embankment slope. (3) Effective anchorage length of inclined steel grouting pipe in loess embankment slope will be slightly increased when increasing anchorage length, while the ratio of effective anchorage length to total anchorage length will be decreased when increasing anchorage length. (4) Inclined steel grouting pipe average cohesive strength along effective anchorage length section at the interface between cement grouting and soil stratum is at least three times compared with that of rock bolt.…”

Realistic structure diagram of testing equipment. by Jiawei Fan (8822046)

“…The field experimental results illustrated that: (1) The bearing capacity of inclined steel grouting pipe with anchorage length of 9 m increases 22.6% compared with that of ordinary grouting pipe. (2) Anchorage length is not a significant influence factor for bearing capacity of inclined steel grouting pipes in loess embankment slope, while anchorage length is a significant influence factor for modulus of load-displacement curves of inclined steel grouting pipes in loess embankment slope. (3) Effective anchorage length of inclined steel grouting pipe in loess embankment slope will be slightly increased when increasing anchorage length, while the ratio of effective anchorage length to total anchorage length will be decreased when increasing anchorage length. (4) Inclined steel grouting pipe average cohesive strength along effective anchorage length section at the interface between cement grouting and soil stratum is at least three times compared with that of rock bolt.…”

Engineering geological cross section diagram. by Jiawei Fan (8822046)

“…The field experimental results illustrated that: (1) The bearing capacity of inclined steel grouting pipe with anchorage length of 9 m increases 22.6% compared with that of ordinary grouting pipe. (2) Anchorage length is not a significant influence factor for bearing capacity of inclined steel grouting pipes in loess embankment slope, while anchorage length is a significant influence factor for modulus of load-displacement curves of inclined steel grouting pipes in loess embankment slope. (3) Effective anchorage length of inclined steel grouting pipe in loess embankment slope will be slightly increased when increasing anchorage length, while the ratio of effective anchorage length to total anchorage length will be decreased when increasing anchorage length. (4) Inclined steel grouting pipe average cohesive strength along effective anchorage length section at the interface between cement grouting and soil stratum is at least three times compared with that of rock bolt.…”

The equipped sensors on steel pipes. by Jiawei Fan (8822046)

“…The field experimental results illustrated that: (1) The bearing capacity of inclined steel grouting pipe with anchorage length of 9 m increases 22.6% compared with that of ordinary grouting pipe. (2) Anchorage length is not a significant influence factor for bearing capacity of inclined steel grouting pipes in loess embankment slope, while anchorage length is a significant influence factor for modulus of load-displacement curves of inclined steel grouting pipes in loess embankment slope. (3) Effective anchorage length of inclined steel grouting pipe in loess embankment slope will be slightly increased when increasing anchorage length, while the ratio of effective anchorage length to total anchorage length will be decreased when increasing anchorage length. (4) Inclined steel grouting pipe average cohesive strength along effective anchorage length section at the interface between cement grouting and soil stratum is at least three times compared with that of rock bolt.…”

Close-up view of the slurry. by Jiawei Fan (8822046)

“…The field experimental results illustrated that: (1) The bearing capacity of inclined steel grouting pipe with anchorage length of 9 m increases 22.6% compared with that of ordinary grouting pipe. (2) Anchorage length is not a significant influence factor for bearing capacity of inclined steel grouting pipes in loess embankment slope, while anchorage length is a significant influence factor for modulus of load-displacement curves of inclined steel grouting pipes in loess embankment slope. (3) Effective anchorage length of inclined steel grouting pipe in loess embankment slope will be slightly increased when increasing anchorage length, while the ratio of effective anchorage length to total anchorage length will be decreased when increasing anchorage length. (4) Inclined steel grouting pipe average cohesive strength along effective anchorage length section at the interface between cement grouting and soil stratum is at least three times compared with that of rock bolt.…”

The physical index properties of the loess. by Jiawei Fan (8822046)

“…The field experimental results illustrated that: (1) The bearing capacity of inclined steel grouting pipe with anchorage length of 9 m increases 22.6% compared with that of ordinary grouting pipe. (2) Anchorage length is not a significant influence factor for bearing capacity of inclined steel grouting pipes in loess embankment slope, while anchorage length is a significant influence factor for modulus of load-displacement curves of inclined steel grouting pipes in loess embankment slope. (3) Effective anchorage length of inclined steel grouting pipe in loess embankment slope will be slightly increased when increasing anchorage length, while the ratio of effective anchorage length to total anchorage length will be decreased when increasing anchorage length. (4) Inclined steel grouting pipe average cohesive strength along effective anchorage length section at the interface between cement grouting and soil stratum is at least three times compared with that of rock bolt.…”

PIF4 autoinhibits its expression depending on photoperiods. by Sreya Das (20531295)

Numbers of nuclei and centrioles per cell. by Yang-In Yim (324355)

“…Note that the values in (D) for HSET KD and combined KD of Myo10 KD and HSET, while significantly different from the control, represent decreases in centriole number, not increases (these decreases may be due to the anti-proliferative effects of HSET KD). …”