Showing 1 - 20 results of 79 for search '(( significantly ((linear decrease) OR (mean decrease)) ) OR ( significantly observed decrease ))~', query time: 0.60s Refine Results
  1. 1

    Baseline patient characteristics. by Oscar F. C. van den Bosch (22184246)

    Published 2025
    “…Their median baseline variabilities of respiratory rate and tidal volume were 0.19 (IQR: 0.16–0.25) and 0.23 (0.19–0.34), respectively. While mean respiratory rate was not affected, midazolam resulted in a significant decrease in both VRR (ß = −0.071, 95% CI: −0.120 to −0.021) and VTV (ß = −0.117, 95% CI: −0.170 to −0.062). …”
  2. 2
  3. 3

    Detailed information of the observation datasets. by Weidong Ji (129916)

    Published 2025
    “…On longer time scales (6–24 hours), the score and correlation between ERA5 and observations further increased, while the centered root-mean-square error (CRMSE) and standard deviation decrease. 4) Hourly wind data with a regular spatial distribution in ERA5 reanalysis provides valuable information for further detailed research on meteorology or renewable energy perspectives, but some inherent shortcomings should be considered.…”
  4. 4
  5. 5

    Data. by Aroon La-up (14095691)

    Published 2025
    “…However, no statistically significant changes were observed in groups with U-Cd levels above 2.0 μg/g creatinine. …”
  6. 6

    Mean parameter values for the selected crops. by Gourab Saha (8987405)

    Published 2025
    “…Furthermore, crop yield is predicted using Linear Regression and Random Forest, achieving accuracies of 93.49% and 95.87%, respectively, while using RMSE (Root Mean Squared Error) as the loss function. …”
  7. 7

    Flowchart of the study population. by Gábor Szaló (22615130)

    Published 2025
    “…Among those 803 individuals who did not take antihypertensive medication, there was a significant association in linear regression between increase in PSS-10 and decrease in C2 (B: −0.2, 95% CI: −0.4- −0.02; p = 0.03) that was lost after adjustment for physical activity (B: −0.16, 95% CI: −0.35–0.03; p = 0.1). …”
  8. 8

    Characteristics of study population. by Gábor Szaló (22615130)

    Published 2025
    “…Among those 803 individuals who did not take antihypertensive medication, there was a significant association in linear regression between increase in PSS-10 and decrease in C2 (B: −0.2, 95% CI: −0.4- −0.02; p = 0.03) that was lost after adjustment for physical activity (B: −0.16, 95% CI: −0.35–0.03; p = 0.1). …”
  9. 9

    General technical specification for GW154/6700. by Weidong Ji (129916)

    Published 2025
    “…On longer time scales (6–24 hours), the score and correlation between ERA5 and observations further increased, while the centered root-mean-square error (CRMSE) and standard deviation decrease. 4) Hourly wind data with a regular spatial distribution in ERA5 reanalysis provides valuable information for further detailed research on meteorology or renewable energy perspectives, but some inherent shortcomings should be considered.…”
  10. 10
  11. 11
  12. 12
  13. 13
  14. 14
  15. 15
  16. 16
  17. 17
  18. 18

    Optimisation of read depth, DNA quantity, and unique alternate observation threshold. by Melinda L. Tursky (20790436)

    Published 2025
    “…C: The association between expected VAF and observed VAF according to read depth. Lower read depth may contribute to an overestimated VAF of very small variants, although differences did not reach significance. …”
  19. 19

    Validation and predictive accuracy of the cerebrovascular model, by Hadi Esfandi (21387211)

    Published 2025
    “…This observation suggests that the myogenic response is potentially linearly potentiated with increasing WT; however, the decreased constriction ability of muscles in the sloped phase, is proven to be advantageous for the vasculature, as it prevents reduced blood flow in deeper layers at high ABNP values. …”
  20. 20

    Performance comparison of ML models. by Gourab Saha (8987405)

    Published 2025
    “…Furthermore, crop yield is predicted using Linear Regression and Random Forest, achieving accuracies of 93.49% and 95.87%, respectively, while using RMSE (Root Mean Squared Error) as the loss function. …”