Search alternatives:
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
linear decrease » linear increase (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search)
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
linear decrease » linear increase (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search)
-
7081
-
7082
-
7083
-
7084
-
7085
-
7086
-
7087
-
7088
-
7089
-
7090
-
7091
-
7092
Accuracy on the ERAM task.
Published 2024“…However, coefficients for estrogen were significant for both emotion recognition tasks. Higher within-person levels of estrogen predicted lower accuracy, whereas higher between-person estrogen levels predicted greater accuracy. …”
-
7093
General characteristics of study subjects.
Published 2025“…COVID-19 did not affect inpatient mortality (p = 0.9608), but in-hospital mortality decreased from 12% to 7% in the medical aid group.</p><p>Conclusion</p><p>Overall, we found that COVID-19 had an impact on admission rates of patients with AMI but did not have a significant impact on in-hospital mortality. …”
-
7094
-
7095
-
7096
-
7097
-
7098
Table 5_PABPN1 as a pan-cancer biomarker: prognostic significance and association with tumor immune microenvironment.xlsx
Published 2025“…After down expression of PABPN1, mRNA expression levels of MRPS15 and GPx (Glutathione peroxidase) decreased significantly in T24, 5637 HLF and MCF-7 cells.…”
-
7099
Image 8_PABPN1 as a pan-cancer biomarker: prognostic significance and association with tumor immune microenvironment.tif
Published 2025“…After down expression of PABPN1, mRNA expression levels of MRPS15 and GPx (Glutathione peroxidase) decreased significantly in T24, 5637 HLF and MCF-7 cells.…”
-
7100
Table2_Significant nocturnal wakefulness after sleep onset in metabolic dysfunction–associated steatotic liver disease.DOCX
Published 2024“…HC 45.4 min vs. 21.3 min, p = 0.0004), and decreased sleep efficiency (MASLD vs. HC 86.5% vs. 92.8%, p = 0.0008) compared with HC despite comparable sleep duration. …”