Showing 141 - 160 results of 4,145 for search '(( significantly ((linear decrease) OR (nn decrease)) ) OR ( significantly affect decrease ))', query time: 0.51s Refine Results
  1. 141
  2. 142
  3. 143
  4. 144
  5. 145
  6. 146
  7. 147
  8. 148
  9. 149
  10. 150
  11. 151
  12. 152
  13. 153

    Threading Behavior and Dynamics of Ring-Linear Polymer Blends under Poiseuille Flow by Deyin Wang (6028850)

    Published 2024
    “…However, as rings are semiflexible (<i>K</i><sub>br</sub> > 0), the threading probability significantly decreases and then significantly increases as the flow field strength increases. …”
  14. 154

    Study-related adverse events. by Benjamin R. Lewis (22279166)

    Published 2025
    “…We recorded 12 study-related, Grade 1–2 AEs and no serious AEs. In a linear mixed model analysis (LMM), the MBSR + PAP arm evidenced a significantly larger decrease in QIDS-SR-16 score than the MBSR-only arm from baseline to 2-weeks post-intervention (between-groups effect = 4.6, 95% CI [1.51, 7.70]; <i>p</i> = 0.008). …”
  15. 155

    Study flow chart. by Benjamin R. Lewis (22279166)

    Published 2025
    “…We recorded 12 study-related, Grade 1–2 AEs and no serious AEs. In a linear mixed model analysis (LMM), the MBSR + PAP arm evidenced a significantly larger decrease in QIDS-SR-16 score than the MBSR-only arm from baseline to 2-weeks post-intervention (between-groups effect = 4.6, 95% CI [1.51, 7.70]; <i>p</i> = 0.008). …”
  16. 156

    Study CONSORT diagram. by Benjamin R. Lewis (22279166)

    Published 2025
    “…We recorded 12 study-related, Grade 1–2 AEs and no serious AEs. In a linear mixed model analysis (LMM), the MBSR + PAP arm evidenced a significantly larger decrease in QIDS-SR-16 score than the MBSR-only arm from baseline to 2-weeks post-intervention (between-groups effect = 4.6, 95% CI [1.51, 7.70]; <i>p</i> = 0.008). …”
  17. 157
  18. 158
  19. 159
  20. 160

    Association between FF Proximity and BMI by sex. by Kimberly Yuin Y’ng Wong (22766265)

    Published 2025
    “…An exponential decrease in FF proximity was associated with 0.7 kg/m<sup>2</sup> (p < 0.001) increase in BMI among males and 0.4 kg/m<sup>2</sup> (p < 0.05) decrease among females. …”