Search alternatives:
significantly lower » significantly higher (Expand Search)
linear decrease » linear increase (Expand Search)
lower decrease » larger decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search)
significantly lower » significantly higher (Expand Search)
linear decrease » linear increase (Expand Search)
lower decrease » larger decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search)
-
1561
Table 1_Impact of co-infections and immune responses on clinical severity of human adenovirus 3 and 7 infections in hospitalized children with lower respiratory tract infections: a...
Published 2025“…</p>Methods<p>This study involved a retrospective analysis of respiratory specimens collected from enrolled children with lower respiratory tract infections (LRTIs), positive for HAdV-3 or HAdV-7 from January 2017 to December 2019. …”
-
1562
Bacterial strains used in this study.
Published 2025“…The proportion of Smurf individuals was significantly lower in <i><i>C. elegans</i></i> fed <i><i>P. copri</i></i> cultured in TJ medium than in those fed the same bacteria cultured in normal medium, while other strains showed no such medium-dependent differences. …”
-
1563
-
1564
-
1565
-
1566
-
1567
Sociodemographic characteristics of the sample.
Published 2025“…Statistical analyses included descriptive statistics, Spearman’s correlation, and multiple linear regression. Participants demonstrated significantly higher awareness of scientifically established cancer causes (70.7%) compared to mythical ones (10.2%). …”
-
1568
Means scores of CAM and CAM-MYCS.
Published 2025“…Statistical analyses included descriptive statistics, Spearman’s correlation, and multiple linear regression. Participants demonstrated significantly higher awareness of scientifically established cancer causes (70.7%) compared to mythical ones (10.2%). …”
-
1569
-
1570
Study-related adverse events.
Published 2025“…We recorded 12 study-related, Grade 1–2 AEs and no serious AEs. In a linear mixed model analysis (LMM), the MBSR + PAP arm evidenced a significantly larger decrease in QIDS-SR-16 score than the MBSR-only arm from baseline to 2-weeks post-intervention (between-groups effect = 4.6, 95% CI [1.51, 7.70]; <i>p</i> = 0.008). …”
-
1571
Study flow chart.
Published 2025“…We recorded 12 study-related, Grade 1–2 AEs and no serious AEs. In a linear mixed model analysis (LMM), the MBSR + PAP arm evidenced a significantly larger decrease in QIDS-SR-16 score than the MBSR-only arm from baseline to 2-weeks post-intervention (between-groups effect = 4.6, 95% CI [1.51, 7.70]; <i>p</i> = 0.008). …”
-
1572
Study CONSORT diagram.
Published 2025“…We recorded 12 study-related, Grade 1–2 AEs and no serious AEs. In a linear mixed model analysis (LMM), the MBSR + PAP arm evidenced a significantly larger decrease in QIDS-SR-16 score than the MBSR-only arm from baseline to 2-weeks post-intervention (between-groups effect = 4.6, 95% CI [1.51, 7.70]; <i>p</i> = 0.008). …”
-
1573
-
1574
-
1575
-
1576
Patients’ responses to EQ5-D items.
Published 2024“…Moreover, patients with only an elementary education had significantly lower EQ5-D scores compared to those with a postgraduate education (-0.106, 95%CI (-0.190, -0.023), p = 0.013).…”
-
1577
Data Sheet 1_Trends in lower extremity peripheral arterial disease incidence since 1990 and forecasting future statistics using Global Burden of Disease 2021: a time-series analysi...
Published 2025“…Background<p>Lower extremity peripheral arterial disease (LEPAD) significantly affects quality of life and is associated with severe cardiovascular risks. …”
-
1578
Sensitivity analysis.
Published 2025“…According to the follow-up, 271 (56.7%) were in the exclusive breastfeeding group and the rest in the non-exclusive breastfeeding group (n = 207, 43.3%). A significant decrease in exclusive breastfeeding rate was observed in the prolonged TTP group compared to the short TTP group (OR=0.46, 95% CI: 0.27–0.74). …”
-
1579
Characteristics of participants.
Published 2025“…According to the follow-up, 271 (56.7%) were in the exclusive breastfeeding group and the rest in the non-exclusive breastfeeding group (n = 207, 43.3%). A significant decrease in exclusive breastfeeding rate was observed in the prolonged TTP group compared to the short TTP group (OR=0.46, 95% CI: 0.27–0.74). …”
-
1580
Participant Flowchart.
Published 2025“…According to the follow-up, 271 (56.7%) were in the exclusive breastfeeding group and the rest in the non-exclusive breastfeeding group (n = 207, 43.3%). A significant decrease in exclusive breastfeeding rate was observed in the prolonged TTP group compared to the short TTP group (OR=0.46, 95% CI: 0.27–0.74). …”