Search alternatives:
significant promoter » significantly promoted (Expand Search), significant promoting (Expand Search), significant promise (Expand Search)
promoter editing » prime editing (Expand Search)
linear decrease » linear increase (Expand Search)
teer decrease » mean decrease (Expand Search), greater decrease (Expand Search)
significant promoter » significantly promoted (Expand Search), significant promoting (Expand Search), significant promise (Expand Search)
promoter editing » prime editing (Expand Search)
linear decrease » linear increase (Expand Search)
teer decrease » mean decrease (Expand Search), greater decrease (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
-
5
-
6
-
7
-
8
-
9
Transepithelial electrical resistance (TEER) (N = 6).
Published 2024“…<p><b>(A)</b> During the cultivation of SMC and ALI we observed significantly differences on day 18 (SMC: 9.61 kΩ*cm<sup>2</sup>; ALI: 7.73 kΩ*cm<sup>2</sup>; p<0.05) and day 25 (SMC: 8.19 kΩ*cm<sup>2</sup>; ALI: 6.44 kΩ*cm<sup>2</sup>; p<0.05) ALI cultures showed significantly decreased values compared to SMC. …”
-
10
-
11
-
12
-
13
-
14
Image 4_Improving gene editing of CRISPR/Cas9 using the callus-specific promoter pYCE1 in cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz).tif
Published 2025“…In single-gene editing, the mutation rate was significantly increased, which reached an overall mutation rate of 95.24% and a homozygous mutation rate of 52.38%, compared with 62.07% and 37.93% with the 35S promoter, respectively. …”
-
15
Image 2_Improving gene editing of CRISPR/Cas9 using the callus-specific promoter pYCE1 in cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz).tif
Published 2025“…In single-gene editing, the mutation rate was significantly increased, which reached an overall mutation rate of 95.24% and a homozygous mutation rate of 52.38%, compared with 62.07% and 37.93% with the 35S promoter, respectively. …”
-
16
Data Sheet 1_Improving gene editing of CRISPR/Cas9 using the callus-specific promoter pYCE1 in cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz).docx
Published 2025“…In single-gene editing, the mutation rate was significantly increased, which reached an overall mutation rate of 95.24% and a homozygous mutation rate of 52.38%, compared with 62.07% and 37.93% with the 35S promoter, respectively. …”
-
17
Table 1_Improving gene editing of CRISPR/Cas9 using the callus-specific promoter pYCE1 in cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz).xlsx
Published 2025“…In single-gene editing, the mutation rate was significantly increased, which reached an overall mutation rate of 95.24% and a homozygous mutation rate of 52.38%, compared with 62.07% and 37.93% with the 35S promoter, respectively. …”
-
18
Image 1_Improving gene editing of CRISPR/Cas9 using the callus-specific promoter pYCE1 in cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz).tif
Published 2025“…In single-gene editing, the mutation rate was significantly increased, which reached an overall mutation rate of 95.24% and a homozygous mutation rate of 52.38%, compared with 62.07% and 37.93% with the 35S promoter, respectively. …”
-
19
Image 3_Improving gene editing of CRISPR/Cas9 using the callus-specific promoter pYCE1 in cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz).tif
Published 2025“…In single-gene editing, the mutation rate was significantly increased, which reached an overall mutation rate of 95.24% and a homozygous mutation rate of 52.38%, compared with 62.07% and 37.93% with the 35S promoter, respectively. …”
-
20