Search alternatives:
significantly differed » significantly different (Expand Search), significantly differ (Expand Search), significantly affected (Expand Search)
linear decrease » linear increase (Expand Search)
teer decrease » mean decrease (Expand Search), greater decrease (Expand Search)
significantly differed » significantly different (Expand Search), significantly differ (Expand Search), significantly affected (Expand Search)
linear decrease » linear increase (Expand Search)
teer decrease » mean decrease (Expand Search), greater decrease (Expand Search)
-
241
Average of % peptides counts for different classes of proteins at different germination time points and significant p-value indicated as compared to soaked sample (*p< 0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001) for garbanzo trypsinised with shades of green showing increase and red showing decrease with respect to soaked.
Published 2024“…<p>Average of % peptides counts for different classes of proteins at different germination time points and significant p-value indicated as compared to soaked sample (*p< 0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001) for garbanzo trypsinised with shades of green showing increase and red showing decrease with respect to soaked.…”
-
242
-
243
-
244
-
245
-
246
-
247
-
248
-
249
-
250
-
251
-
252
-
253
-
254
-
255
-
256
Signal intensity curve at different porosities.
Published 2024“…The results indicate that the received signal intensity of electromagnetic waves across different frequency bands diminishes with increasing propagation distance in the lossy environment of the goaf. …”
-
257
-
258
-
259
-
260
Average % peptides counts for different classes of proteins at different germination time points and significant p-value indicated as compared to soaked sample (*p< 0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001) for brown non-trypsinised with shades of green showing increase and red showing decrease with respect to soaked.
Published 2024“…<p>Average % peptides counts for different classes of proteins at different germination time points and significant p-value indicated as compared to soaked sample (*p< 0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001) for brown non-trypsinised with shades of green showing increase and red showing decrease with respect to soaked.…”