Search alternatives:
significant gender » significant concern (Expand Search), significant burden (Expand Search)
linear decrease » linear increase (Expand Search)
gender decrease » greater decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search)
we decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search)
significant gender » significant concern (Expand Search), significant burden (Expand Search)
linear decrease » linear increase (Expand Search)
gender decrease » greater decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search)
we decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search)
-
21
-
22
-
23
-
24
-
25
-
26
-
27
-
28
-
29
-
30
Univariate linear regression analysis of scales.
Published 2025“…<div><p>Objective</p><p>Body image perception significantly impacts university students’ well-being and potentially their creativity. …”
-
31
Overview of the WeARTolerance program.
Published 2024“…<div><p>The stigma surrounding mental health remains a significant barrier to help-seeking and well-being in youth populations. …”
-
32
Significantly Enriched Pathways.
Published 2025“…By comparing samples from NAFLD patients and healthy controls, we identified 1,770 significant DEGs, with 1,073 being upregulated and 697 downregulated. …”
-
33
Study-related adverse events.
Published 2025“…In a linear mixed model analysis (LMM), the MBSR + PAP arm evidenced a significantly larger decrease in QIDS-SR-16 score than the MBSR-only arm from baseline to 2-weeks post-intervention (between-groups effect = 4.6, 95% CI [1.51, 7.70]; <i>p</i> = 0.008). …”
-
34
Study flow chart.
Published 2025“…In a linear mixed model analysis (LMM), the MBSR + PAP arm evidenced a significantly larger decrease in QIDS-SR-16 score than the MBSR-only arm from baseline to 2-weeks post-intervention (between-groups effect = 4.6, 95% CI [1.51, 7.70]; <i>p</i> = 0.008). …”
-
35
Study CONSORT diagram.
Published 2025“…In a linear mixed model analysis (LMM), the MBSR + PAP arm evidenced a significantly larger decrease in QIDS-SR-16 score than the MBSR-only arm from baseline to 2-weeks post-intervention (between-groups effect = 4.6, 95% CI [1.51, 7.70]; <i>p</i> = 0.008). …”
-
36
Demographics by Country and Gender.
Published 2025“…Regarding creative self-efficacy, we found gender-specific impacts, with male participants experiencing a decrease, contrary to our expectations. …”
-
37
-
38
-
39
-
40