Search alternatives:
significant benefits » significant effects (Expand Search)
linked decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
linear decrease » linear increase (Expand Search)
Showing 101 - 120 results of 3,500 for search '(( significantly ((linked decrease) OR (linear decrease)) ) OR ( significant benefits decrease ))', query time: 0.31s Refine Results
  1. 101
  2. 102
  3. 103
  4. 104
  5. 105
  6. 106
  7. 107
  8. 108
  9. 109
  10. 110
  11. 111
  12. 112
  13. 113

    Design of the D-trial. by Torsten Schober (20485754)

    Published 2024
    “…An increase in PD led to a linear decrease in inflorescence yield per plant (<i>p</i> = 0.02), whereas a positive linear relationship was found for inflorescence yield (<i>p</i> = 0.0001) and CBD yield (<i>p</i> = 0.0002) per m<sup>2</sup>. …”
  14. 114

    Estimated mean values for light interception. by Torsten Schober (20485754)

    Published 2024
    “…An increase in PD led to a linear decrease in inflorescence yield per plant (<i>p</i> = 0.02), whereas a positive linear relationship was found for inflorescence yield (<i>p</i> = 0.0001) and CBD yield (<i>p</i> = 0.0002) per m<sup>2</sup>. …”
  15. 115

    Raw data V-trial. by Torsten Schober (20485754)

    Published 2024
    “…An increase in PD led to a linear decrease in inflorescence yield per plant (<i>p</i> = 0.02), whereas a positive linear relationship was found for inflorescence yield (<i>p</i> = 0.0001) and CBD yield (<i>p</i> = 0.0002) per m<sup>2</sup>. …”
  16. 116

    Raw data D-trial. by Torsten Schober (20485754)

    Published 2024
    “…An increase in PD led to a linear decrease in inflorescence yield per plant (<i>p</i> = 0.02), whereas a positive linear relationship was found for inflorescence yield (<i>p</i> = 0.0001) and CBD yield (<i>p</i> = 0.0002) per m<sup>2</sup>. …”
  17. 117
  18. 118
  19. 119
  20. 120