Search alternatives:
significant effect » significant impact (Expand Search)
longer decrease » linear decrease (Expand Search), largest decrease (Expand Search)
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
Showing 121 - 140 results of 9,632 for search '(( significantly ((longer decrease) OR (larger decrease)) ) OR ( significant effect repeated ))', query time: 0.52s Refine Results
  1. 121
  2. 122
  3. 123
  4. 124
  5. 125
  6. 126
  7. 127

    Variation in repeat abundance across individuals. by Julia M. Kreiner (6368987)

    Published 2023
    “…Points represent raw data, while regression lines and error bars represent the least squares mean from a mixed effect model that accounts for relatedness. Relationships shown for a subset of significant (p<0.05) predictors.…”
  8. 128
  9. 129
  10. 130
  11. 131
  12. 132
  13. 133
  14. 134

    EFFECT OF TRAINING ON THE REPEATED SPRINTS ABILITY IN BASKETBALL ATHLETES: INDIVIDUAL OR TEAM STATISTICS? by Tiago Volpi Braz (6546428)

    Published 2019
    “…<p></p><p>ABSTRACT The aim of the present study was verify the chronic training effect on the repeated sprints ability (RSA) in basketball athlete and later, compare the individual’s statistics with those of the team. …”
  15. 135

    Adult rat ultrasonic vocalizations and reward: effects of propranolol and repeated cocaine administration by Leyla Erden (19332313)

    Published 2024
    “…Here, we investigated the effects of acute and repeated cocaine administration, and—based on previous findings with amphetamine—their possible dependence on beta?…”
  16. 136
  17. 137

    Multivariate and within group effects. by Michele Aquino (19469816)

    Published 2024
    “…Analyses of variance at each time point across conditions and for the percent change elicited by each intervention were conducted to determine significant differences (p < 0.05).</p><p>Results</p><p>Repeated-measures ANOVA revealed a significant difference between mean percent difference of sit-and-reach score for FR (8.8 ± 0.5%) compared to DWU and PM (p = 0.046 and 0.048, respectively) while DWU (6.3 ± 0.8%) and PM (6.8 ± 0.5%) did not differ (p = 0.717). …”
  18. 138
  19. 139
  20. 140