Search alternatives:
significantly less » significantly lower (Expand Search), significantly reduce (Expand Search), significantly better (Expand Search)
longer decrease » linear decrease (Expand Search), largest decrease (Expand Search)
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
less increase » loss increases (Expand Search), lenses increased (Expand Search), peaks increase (Expand Search)
significantly less » significantly lower (Expand Search), significantly reduce (Expand Search), significantly better (Expand Search)
longer decrease » linear decrease (Expand Search), largest decrease (Expand Search)
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
less increase » loss increases (Expand Search), lenses increased (Expand Search), peaks increase (Expand Search)
-
81
Spike prediction coherence and NST standard deviation as a function of size of recent event history.
Published 2023Subjects: -
82
Evolution of ISI distributions as a function of number of inputs in input encoding.
Published 2023Subjects: -
83
-
84
-
85
-
86
Post-RARP urinary continence recovery stratified by voided volume change.
Published 2022“…<p>Kaplan-Meier curves for post-operative continence recovery to (A) use of 1 pad or less per day, and (B) pad-free status, as stratified by change in voided volume. A statistically significant difference was found for both curves, with a larger decrease in voided volume exhibiting a lower continence rate (log-rank test: P value = 0.011 and 0.008, respectively). …”
-
87
-
88
-
89
-
90
-
91
Time distortions are suppressed for longer Standard events.
Published 2022“…<b>a)</b> With a 120-ms S (corresponding to an 8.33 Hz attentive rhythm) we observed a decrease of the CE as a function of ISI: ISIs longer than 800 ms decreased subjective distortions of the stimuli. …”
-
92
-
93
Spatial information is significantly decreased in dCA1 and vCA1 in APP/PS1 mice.
Published 2024“…The spatial information in dCA1 was significantly larger than circularly shuffled spike trains with similar mean firing rates for C57BL/6 mice (mean ± std: empirical = 0.132 ± 0.048, shuffled = 0.124 ± 0.035, p < 0.001, two-sided Wilcoxon rank-sum test, n<sub>empirical</sub> = 305 units from 5 recording sessions, n<sub>shuffled</sub> = 30500 simulated units from 5 recording sessions), but not for APP/PS1 mice (mean ± std: empirical = 0.128 ± 0.051, shuffled = 0.123 ± .047, p = 0.39, two-sided Wilcoxon rank-sum test, n<sub>empirical</sub> = 180 units from 4 recording sessions, n<sub>shuffled</sub> = 18000 simulated units from 4 recording sessions). …”
-
94
-
95
-
96
-
97
-
98
-
99
-
100
The relative frequency of carbon trading price changes with B under the characteristic time scale.
Published 2024Subjects: