Showing 481 - 500 results of 6,796 for search '(( significantly ((longer decrease) OR (linear decrease)) ) OR ( significantly improve decrease ))', query time: 0.34s Refine Results
  1. 481
  2. 482
  3. 483
  4. 484

    S1 File - by Qingqing Hao (5464070)

    Published 2024
    Subjects:
  5. 485
  6. 486
  7. 487

    Fig 3 - by Qingqing Hao (5464070)

    Published 2024
    Subjects:
  8. 488

    GRADE judgements. by Da Huang (1306407)

    Published 2025
    “…The study results demonstrated that physical exercise combined with conventional rehabilitation significantly improved VO<sub>2Peak</sub> (MD = 4.91, 95% CI: 3.52–6.29, P < 0.001), 6MWT (MD = 37.11, 95% CI: 11.72–62.51, P = 0.004), FVC% (MD = 6.54, 95% CI: 4.9–8.17, P < 0.001), and FEV<sub>1</sub>% (MD = 8.27, 95% CI: 7.39–9.14, P < 0.001) in burn patients compared to conventional rehabilitation. …”
  9. 489

    Basic characteristics of the included studies. by Da Huang (1306407)

    Published 2025
    “…The study results demonstrated that physical exercise combined with conventional rehabilitation significantly improved VO<sub>2Peak</sub> (MD = 4.91, 95% CI: 3.52–6.29, P < 0.001), 6MWT (MD = 37.11, 95% CI: 11.72–62.51, P = 0.004), FVC% (MD = 6.54, 95% CI: 4.9–8.17, P < 0.001), and FEV<sub>1</sub>% (MD = 8.27, 95% CI: 7.39–9.14, P < 0.001) in burn patients compared to conventional rehabilitation. …”
  10. 490

    The data of meta-analysis. by Da Huang (1306407)

    Published 2025
    “…The study results demonstrated that physical exercise combined with conventional rehabilitation significantly improved VO<sub>2Peak</sub> (MD = 4.91, 95% CI: 3.52–6.29, P < 0.001), 6MWT (MD = 37.11, 95% CI: 11.72–62.51, P = 0.004), FVC% (MD = 6.54, 95% CI: 4.9–8.17, P < 0.001), and FEV<sub>1</sub>% (MD = 8.27, 95% CI: 7.39–9.14, P < 0.001) in burn patients compared to conventional rehabilitation. …”
  11. 491

    Risk of bias. by Da Huang (1306407)

    Published 2025
    “…The study results demonstrated that physical exercise combined with conventional rehabilitation significantly improved VO<sub>2Peak</sub> (MD = 4.91, 95% CI: 3.52–6.29, P < 0.001), 6MWT (MD = 37.11, 95% CI: 11.72–62.51, P = 0.004), FVC% (MD = 6.54, 95% CI: 4.9–8.17, P < 0.001), and FEV<sub>1</sub>% (MD = 8.27, 95% CI: 7.39–9.14, P < 0.001) in burn patients compared to conventional rehabilitation. …”
  12. 492

    Overall risk of bias assessment. by Da Huang (1306407)

    Published 2025
    “…The study results demonstrated that physical exercise combined with conventional rehabilitation significantly improved VO<sub>2Peak</sub> (MD = 4.91, 95% CI: 3.52–6.29, P < 0.001), 6MWT (MD = 37.11, 95% CI: 11.72–62.51, P = 0.004), FVC% (MD = 6.54, 95% CI: 4.9–8.17, P < 0.001), and FEV<sub>1</sub>% (MD = 8.27, 95% CI: 7.39–9.14, P < 0.001) in burn patients compared to conventional rehabilitation. …”
  13. 493

    Funnel plot of VO<sub>2Peak</sub> inclusion studies. by Da Huang (1306407)

    Published 2025
    “…The study results demonstrated that physical exercise combined with conventional rehabilitation significantly improved VO<sub>2Peak</sub> (MD = 4.91, 95% CI: 3.52–6.29, P < 0.001), 6MWT (MD = 37.11, 95% CI: 11.72–62.51, P = 0.004), FVC% (MD = 6.54, 95% CI: 4.9–8.17, P < 0.001), and FEV<sub>1</sub>% (MD = 8.27, 95% CI: 7.39–9.14, P < 0.001) in burn patients compared to conventional rehabilitation. …”
  14. 494

    Analysis of subgroups. by Da Huang (1306407)

    Published 2025
    “…The study results demonstrated that physical exercise combined with conventional rehabilitation significantly improved VO<sub>2Peak</sub> (MD = 4.91, 95% CI: 3.52–6.29, P < 0.001), 6MWT (MD = 37.11, 95% CI: 11.72–62.51, P = 0.004), FVC% (MD = 6.54, 95% CI: 4.9–8.17, P < 0.001), and FEV<sub>1</sub>% (MD = 8.27, 95% CI: 7.39–9.14, P < 0.001) in burn patients compared to conventional rehabilitation. …”
  15. 495
  16. 496
  17. 497
  18. 498
  19. 499
  20. 500