Search alternatives:
significantly lower » significantly higher (Expand Search)
longer decrease » larger decrease (Expand Search), largest decrease (Expand Search)
linear decrease » linear increase (Expand Search)
lower decrease » larger decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search)
significantly lower » significantly higher (Expand Search)
longer decrease » larger decrease (Expand Search), largest decrease (Expand Search)
linear decrease » linear increase (Expand Search)
lower decrease » larger decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search)
-
1701
Table 1_Impact of co-infections and immune responses on clinical severity of human adenovirus 3 and 7 infections in hospitalized children with lower respiratory tract infections: a...
Published 2025“…</p>Methods<p>This study involved a retrospective analysis of respiratory specimens collected from enrolled children with lower respiratory tract infections (LRTIs), positive for HAdV-3 or HAdV-7 from January 2017 to December 2019. …”
-
1702
Bacterial strains used in this study.
Published 2025“…The proportion of Smurf individuals was significantly lower in <i><i>C. elegans</i></i> fed <i><i>P. copri</i></i> cultured in TJ medium than in those fed the same bacteria cultured in normal medium, while other strains showed no such medium-dependent differences. …”
-
1703
-
1704
-
1705
-
1706
-
1707
-
1708
-
1709
-
1710
-
1711
Sociodemographic characteristics of the sample.
Published 2025“…Statistical analyses included descriptive statistics, Spearman’s correlation, and multiple linear regression. Participants demonstrated significantly higher awareness of scientifically established cancer causes (70.7%) compared to mythical ones (10.2%). …”
-
1712
Means scores of CAM and CAM-MYCS.
Published 2025“…Statistical analyses included descriptive statistics, Spearman’s correlation, and multiple linear regression. Participants demonstrated significantly higher awareness of scientifically established cancer causes (70.7%) compared to mythical ones (10.2%). …”
-
1713
-
1714
Study-related adverse events.
Published 2025“…We recorded 12 study-related, Grade 1–2 AEs and no serious AEs. In a linear mixed model analysis (LMM), the MBSR + PAP arm evidenced a significantly larger decrease in QIDS-SR-16 score than the MBSR-only arm from baseline to 2-weeks post-intervention (between-groups effect = 4.6, 95% CI [1.51, 7.70]; <i>p</i> = 0.008). …”
-
1715
Study flow chart.
Published 2025“…We recorded 12 study-related, Grade 1–2 AEs and no serious AEs. In a linear mixed model analysis (LMM), the MBSR + PAP arm evidenced a significantly larger decrease in QIDS-SR-16 score than the MBSR-only arm from baseline to 2-weeks post-intervention (between-groups effect = 4.6, 95% CI [1.51, 7.70]; <i>p</i> = 0.008). …”
-
1716
Study CONSORT diagram.
Published 2025“…We recorded 12 study-related, Grade 1–2 AEs and no serious AEs. In a linear mixed model analysis (LMM), the MBSR + PAP arm evidenced a significantly larger decrease in QIDS-SR-16 score than the MBSR-only arm from baseline to 2-weeks post-intervention (between-groups effect = 4.6, 95% CI [1.51, 7.70]; <i>p</i> = 0.008). …”
-
1717
-
1718
-
1719
-
1720
Patients’ responses to EQ5-D items.
Published 2024“…Moreover, patients with only an elementary education had significantly lower EQ5-D scores compared to those with a postgraduate education (-0.106, 95%CI (-0.190, -0.023), p = 0.013).…”