Showing 1 - 20 results of 830 for search '(( significantly ((lower decrease) OR (a decrease)) ) OR ( significant clinical decrease ))~', query time: 0.46s Refine Results
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4

    Presentation 1_Decreased brain-derived neurotrophic factor expression in chronic kidney disease: integrated clinical and experimental evidence.pptx by Juan Chen (61123)

    Published 2025
    “…Single-cell mRNA sequencing further confirmed that Bdnf levels were lower in renal proximal tubule (PT) cells, macrophages (Mφ), and podocytes in UUO mice compared to normal controls, Additionally, Bdnf-as—a long non-coding RNA known to epigenetically repress BDNF—was significantly upregulated in proximal tubules of CKD patients based on human transcriptomic data. …”
  5. 5

    Data Sheet 1_Decreased brain-derived neurotrophic factor expression in chronic kidney disease: integrated clinical and experimental evidence.docx by Juan Chen (61123)

    Published 2025
    “…Single-cell mRNA sequencing further confirmed that Bdnf levels were lower in renal proximal tubule (PT) cells, macrophages (Mφ), and podocytes in UUO mice compared to normal controls, Additionally, Bdnf-as—a long non-coding RNA known to epigenetically repress BDNF—was significantly upregulated in proximal tubules of CKD patients based on human transcriptomic data. …”
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8

    Data Sheet 1_Secretoneurin plasma levels are decreased after catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation—patients with AF produce lower SN levels than healthy individuals: the SAFE r... by Jiří Plášek (21805048)

    Published 2025
    “…Plasma SN levels were significantly lower after the catheter ablation as compared with SN levels before (34.0 ± 15.1 and 40.0 ± 17.3 pmol/L, p = 0.032). …”
  9. 9
  10. 10
  11. 11
  12. 12
  13. 13
  14. 14
  15. 15

    The Vancouver Scar Scale. by Na Wang (193263)

    Published 2024
    “…</p><p>Results</p><p>We found that numerical rating scale(NRS) score and incidence of breast fistula in group A were significantly lower than other, the continuous decrease of postoperative drainage in group A was higher than other, there were significant differences among groups (p<0.001). …”
  16. 16

    S1 Dataset - by Na Wang (193263)

    Published 2024
    “…</p><p>Results</p><p>We found that numerical rating scale(NRS) score and incidence of breast fistula in group A were significantly lower than other, the continuous decrease of postoperative drainage in group A was higher than other, there were significant differences among groups (p<0.001). …”
  17. 17

    Numerical Rating Scale (NRS). by Na Wang (193263)

    Published 2024
    “…</p><p>Results</p><p>We found that numerical rating scale(NRS) score and incidence of breast fistula in group A were significantly lower than other, the continuous decrease of postoperative drainage in group A was higher than other, there were significant differences among groups (p<0.001). …”
  18. 18

    Mammary fistula (n(%)). by Na Wang (193263)

    Published 2024
    “…</p><p>Results</p><p>We found that numerical rating scale(NRS) score and incidence of breast fistula in group A were significantly lower than other, the continuous decrease of postoperative drainage in group A was higher than other, there were significant differences among groups (p<0.001). …”
  19. 19

    Forest maps affecting lactation outcomes. by Na Wang (193263)

    Published 2024
    “…</p><p>Results</p><p>We found that numerical rating scale(NRS) score and incidence of breast fistula in group A were significantly lower than other, the continuous decrease of postoperative drainage in group A was higher than other, there were significant differences among groups (p<0.001). …”
  20. 20

    Postoperative drainage(ml) (M(IQR)). by Na Wang (193263)

    Published 2024
    “…</p><p>Results</p><p>We found that numerical rating scale(NRS) score and incidence of breast fistula in group A were significantly lower than other, the continuous decrease of postoperative drainage in group A was higher than other, there were significant differences among groups (p<0.001). …”