Search alternatives:
lower decrease » larger decrease (Expand Search), linear decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search)
gap decrease » gain decreased (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search), step decrease (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
lower decrease » larger decrease (Expand Search), linear decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search)
gap decrease » gain decreased (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search), step decrease (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
-
1
Charge-Transfer-Driven Electrical Conductivity in Single Crystals of Assembled Triphenylamine Bis-urea Macrocycles
Published 2025“…<b>1</b>(MN)<sub>0.39</sub> and <b>1</b>(BTD)<sub>0.5</sub> demonstrated moderate conductivities explained by the interplay of electronic coupling, reorganization energy, and energy gap. Lower ratios of guest inclusion decreased the electrical conductivity by 10-fold in <b>1</b>(ClBQ)<sub>0.18</sub>, while <b>1</b>(MN)<sub>0.25</sub> and <b>1</b>(BTD)<sub>0.41</sub> were nonconductive (10<sup>–9</sup> S cm<sup>–1</sup>). …”
-
2
Charge-Transfer-Driven Electrical Conductivity in Single Crystals of Assembled Triphenylamine Bis-urea Macrocycles
Published 2025“…<b>1</b>(MN)<sub>0.39</sub> and <b>1</b>(BTD)<sub>0.5</sub> demonstrated moderate conductivities explained by the interplay of electronic coupling, reorganization energy, and energy gap. Lower ratios of guest inclusion decreased the electrical conductivity by 10-fold in <b>1</b>(ClBQ)<sub>0.18</sub>, while <b>1</b>(MN)<sub>0.25</sub> and <b>1</b>(BTD)<sub>0.41</sub> were nonconductive (10<sup>–9</sup> S cm<sup>–1</sup>). …”
-
3
Charge-Transfer-Driven Electrical Conductivity in Single Crystals of Assembled Triphenylamine Bis-urea Macrocycles
Published 2025“…<b>1</b>(MN)<sub>0.39</sub> and <b>1</b>(BTD)<sub>0.5</sub> demonstrated moderate conductivities explained by the interplay of electronic coupling, reorganization energy, and energy gap. Lower ratios of guest inclusion decreased the electrical conductivity by 10-fold in <b>1</b>(ClBQ)<sub>0.18</sub>, while <b>1</b>(MN)<sub>0.25</sub> and <b>1</b>(BTD)<sub>0.41</sub> were nonconductive (10<sup>–9</sup> S cm<sup>–1</sup>). …”
-
4
Charge-Transfer-Driven Electrical Conductivity in Single Crystals of Assembled Triphenylamine Bis-urea Macrocycles
Published 2025“…<b>1</b>(MN)<sub>0.39</sub> and <b>1</b>(BTD)<sub>0.5</sub> demonstrated moderate conductivities explained by the interplay of electronic coupling, reorganization energy, and energy gap. Lower ratios of guest inclusion decreased the electrical conductivity by 10-fold in <b>1</b>(ClBQ)<sub>0.18</sub>, while <b>1</b>(MN)<sub>0.25</sub> and <b>1</b>(BTD)<sub>0.41</sub> were nonconductive (10<sup>–9</sup> S cm<sup>–1</sup>). …”
-
5
Charge-Transfer-Driven Electrical Conductivity in Single Crystals of Assembled Triphenylamine Bis-urea Macrocycles
Published 2025“…<b>1</b>(MN)<sub>0.39</sub> and <b>1</b>(BTD)<sub>0.5</sub> demonstrated moderate conductivities explained by the interplay of electronic coupling, reorganization energy, and energy gap. Lower ratios of guest inclusion decreased the electrical conductivity by 10-fold in <b>1</b>(ClBQ)<sub>0.18</sub>, while <b>1</b>(MN)<sub>0.25</sub> and <b>1</b>(BTD)<sub>0.41</sub> were nonconductive (10<sup>–9</sup> S cm<sup>–1</sup>). …”
-
6
Charge-Transfer-Driven Electrical Conductivity in Single Crystals of Assembled Triphenylamine Bis-urea Macrocycles
Published 2025“…<b>1</b>(MN)<sub>0.39</sub> and <b>1</b>(BTD)<sub>0.5</sub> demonstrated moderate conductivities explained by the interplay of electronic coupling, reorganization energy, and energy gap. Lower ratios of guest inclusion decreased the electrical conductivity by 10-fold in <b>1</b>(ClBQ)<sub>0.18</sub>, while <b>1</b>(MN)<sub>0.25</sub> and <b>1</b>(BTD)<sub>0.41</sub> were nonconductive (10<sup>–9</sup> S cm<sup>–1</sup>). …”
-
7
-
8
Frequency of tobacco smoking among smokers.
Published 2025“…</p><p>Results</p><p>Smokers had a significantly higher prevalence of respiratory symptoms and significantly lower FVC, FEV1, FEV1/ FVC, and PEF, FEF 25–75% values than non-smokers. …”
-
9
BMI groups by SES.
Published 2025“…BMI was a significant factor in PTB for lower socioeconomic status (LSES) women. …”
-
10
BMISES_Data_Part2.
Published 2025“…BMI was a significant factor in PTB for lower socioeconomic status (LSES) women. …”
-
11
Logistic regression for LSES population.
Published 2025“…BMI was a significant factor in PTB for lower socioeconomic status (LSES) women. …”
-
12
Logistic regression for HSES population.
Published 2025“…BMI was a significant factor in PTB for lower socioeconomic status (LSES) women. …”
-
13
Logistic regression for overall population.
Published 2025“…BMI was a significant factor in PTB for lower socioeconomic status (LSES) women. …”
-
14
BMISES_Data_Part1.
Published 2025“…BMI was a significant factor in PTB for lower socioeconomic status (LSES) women. …”
-
15
Baseline characteristics of HSES/LSES population.
Published 2025“…BMI was a significant factor in PTB for lower socioeconomic status (LSES) women. …”
-
16
Baseline characteristics of overall population.
Published 2025“…BMI was a significant factor in PTB for lower socioeconomic status (LSES) women. …”
-
17
Diagram of study population.
Published 2025“…BMI was a significant factor in PTB for lower socioeconomic status (LSES) women. …”
-
18
-
19
Characteristics of HACE respondents by year.
Published 2025“…Satisfaction was lower in patients living in more deprived areas at all time points, and the gap between the most and least deprived populations widened over time, with the RII increasing from 1.05 (95% CI 1.04–1.06) in 2011/12 to 1.12 (95% CI 1.08–1.15) in 2021/22. …”
-
20
Conceptual framework to guide the study.
Published 2025“…</p><p>Conclusions</p><p>Marginalized women experience lower uptake of routine maternity care visits and higher discontinuation along the antenatal through to ponstantal period, creating significant equity gaps in Nepal. …”