Search alternatives:
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
greater decrease » greatest decrease (Expand Search), greater increase (Expand Search), greater disease (Expand Search)
lower decrease » larger decrease (Expand Search), linear decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search)
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
greater decrease » greatest decrease (Expand Search), greater increase (Expand Search), greater disease (Expand Search)
lower decrease » larger decrease (Expand Search), linear decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search)
-
5761
-
5762
-
5763
-
5764
-
5765
-
5766
-
5767
Comparison of simulation results.
Published 2024“…These values are significantly lower than the cable clamp’s breaking tensile strength of 70 kN, with peak values of 57.4 N and 94.1 N, respectively. …”
-
5768
Technical parameters of the shearer.
Published 2024“…These values are significantly lower than the cable clamp’s breaking tensile strength of 70 kN, with peak values of 57.4 N and 94.1 N, respectively. …”
-
5769
Simulation-related parameters.
Published 2024“…These values are significantly lower than the cable clamp’s breaking tensile strength of 70 kN, with peak values of 57.4 N and 94.1 N, respectively. …”
-
5770
Chain drive specification parameters.
Published 2024“…These values are significantly lower than the cable clamp’s breaking tensile strength of 70 kN, with peak values of 57.4 N and 94.1 N, respectively. …”
-
5771
Femoral tensile test data.
Published 2024“…These values are significantly lower than the cable clamp’s breaking tensile strength of 70 kN, with peak values of 57.4 N and 94.1 N, respectively. …”
-
5772
-
5773
-
5774
-
5775
-
5776
Descriptive statistics and variable definitions.
Published 2024“…The findings indicate that consumption inequality has a significant negative impact on SWB. Specifically, for every unit increase in consumption inequality, the probability of individuals rating their SWB as “Happy” and “Very happy” decreases by 0.37% and 5.45% respectively. …”
-
5777
The results of endogenous analysis.
Published 2024“…The findings indicate that consumption inequality has a significant negative impact on SWB. Specifically, for every unit increase in consumption inequality, the probability of individuals rating their SWB as “Happy” and “Very happy” decreases by 0.37% and 5.45% respectively. …”
-
5778
Correlation test.
Published 2024“…The findings indicate that consumption inequality has a significant negative impact on SWB. Specifically, for every unit increase in consumption inequality, the probability of individuals rating their SWB as “Happy” and “Very happy” decreases by 0.37% and 5.45% respectively. …”
-
5779
S1 Dataset -
Published 2024“…The findings indicate that consumption inequality has a significant negative impact on SWB. Specifically, for every unit increase in consumption inequality, the probability of individuals rating their SWB as “Happy” and “Very happy” decreases by 0.37% and 5.45% respectively. …”
-
5780
The mediation of confidence.
Published 2024“…The findings indicate that consumption inequality has a significant negative impact on SWB. Specifically, for every unit increase in consumption inequality, the probability of individuals rating their SWB as “Happy” and “Very happy” decreases by 0.37% and 5.45% respectively. …”