Search alternatives:
increase decrease » increased release (Expand Search), increased crash (Expand Search)
greater decrease » greatest decrease (Expand Search), greater increase (Expand Search), greater disease (Expand Search)
lower decrease » larger decrease (Expand Search), linear decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search)
increase decrease » increased release (Expand Search), increased crash (Expand Search)
greater decrease » greatest decrease (Expand Search), greater increase (Expand Search), greater disease (Expand Search)
lower decrease » larger decrease (Expand Search), linear decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search)
-
1801
-
1802
-
1803
A schematic view of ACS.
Published 2025“…The results show a COP of 0.79 with a cooling capacity of 5 kW at generator, condenser, evaporator, and absorber temperatures of (90, 40, 10, and 35), respectively. The COP increases as the evaporator temperature increases, and it decreases as the condenser and absorber temperature increases. …”
-
1804
Assumed conditions.
Published 2025“…The results show a COP of 0.79 with a cooling capacity of 5 kW at generator, condenser, evaporator, and absorber temperatures of (90, 40, 10, and 35), respectively. The COP increases as the evaporator temperature increases, and it decreases as the condenser and absorber temperature increases. …”
-
1805
Shows the amount of emission reductions.
Published 2025“…The results show a COP of 0.79 with a cooling capacity of 5 kW at generator, condenser, evaporator, and absorber temperatures of (90, 40, 10, and 35), respectively. The COP increases as the evaporator temperature increases, and it decreases as the condenser and absorber temperature increases. …”
-
1806
Comparison COP of our study with Florides et al.
Published 2025“…The results show a COP of 0.79 with a cooling capacity of 5 kW at generator, condenser, evaporator, and absorber temperatures of (90, 40, 10, and 35), respectively. The COP increases as the evaporator temperature increases, and it decreases as the condenser and absorber temperature increases. …”
-
1807
Effect of generator temperature on COP.
Published 2025“…The results show a COP of 0.79 with a cooling capacity of 5 kW at generator, condenser, evaporator, and absorber temperatures of (90, 40, 10, and 35), respectively. The COP increases as the evaporator temperature increases, and it decreases as the condenser and absorber temperature increases. …”
-
1808
Emission factors.
Published 2025“…The results show a COP of 0.79 with a cooling capacity of 5 kW at generator, condenser, evaporator, and absorber temperatures of (90, 40, 10, and 35), respectively. The COP increases as the evaporator temperature increases, and it decreases as the condenser and absorber temperature increases. …”
-
1809
Magnitude of emission reduction.
Published 2025“…The results show a COP of 0.79 with a cooling capacity of 5 kW at generator, condenser, evaporator, and absorber temperatures of (90, 40, 10, and 35), respectively. The COP increases as the evaporator temperature increases, and it decreases as the condenser and absorber temperature increases. …”
-
1810
Assumed conditions.
Published 2025“…The results show a COP of 0.79 with a cooling capacity of 5 kW at generator, condenser, evaporator, and absorber temperatures of (90, 40, 10, and 35), respectively. The COP increases as the evaporator temperature increases, and it decreases as the condenser and absorber temperature increases. …”
-
1811
Fixed simulation data.
Published 2025“…The results show a COP of 0.79 with a cooling capacity of 5 kW at generator, condenser, evaporator, and absorber temperatures of (90, 40, 10, and 35), respectively. The COP increases as the evaporator temperature increases, and it decreases as the condenser and absorber temperature increases. …”
-
1812
pone.0324800.t002 -
Published 2025“…The results show a COP of 0.79 with a cooling capacity of 5 kW at generator, condenser, evaporator, and absorber temperatures of (90, 40, 10, and 35), respectively. The COP increases as the evaporator temperature increases, and it decreases as the condenser and absorber temperature increases. …”
-
1813
Impact of heat exchanger effectiveness on COP.
Published 2025“…The results show a COP of 0.79 with a cooling capacity of 5 kW at generator, condenser, evaporator, and absorber temperatures of (90, 40, 10, and 35), respectively. The COP increases as the evaporator temperature increases, and it decreases as the condenser and absorber temperature increases. …”
-
1814
Assumed conditions.
Published 2025“…The results show a COP of 0.79 with a cooling capacity of 5 kW at generator, condenser, evaporator, and absorber temperatures of (90, 40, 10, and 35), respectively. The COP increases as the evaporator temperature increases, and it decreases as the condenser and absorber temperature increases. …”
-
1815
Assumed conditions.
Published 2025“…The results show a COP of 0.79 with a cooling capacity of 5 kW at generator, condenser, evaporator, and absorber temperatures of (90, 40, 10, and 35), respectively. The COP increases as the evaporator temperature increases, and it decreases as the condenser and absorber temperature increases. …”
-
1816
S1 Table -
Published 2024“…The results showed that throughout the entire experimental process, the hydraulic pressure remained continuously stable, with a decrease of only 0.14%; The variation pattern of peak strength of fissured rock mass with increasing crack inclination angle under stable hydraulic pressure changes from a decrease and then an increase in the absence of hydraulic pressure to an increasing trend; The crack propagation length of low angle fissured rock mass is generally higher than that of high angle fissured specimens. …”
-
1817
Characteristic curve of damage variable stage.
Published 2024“…The results showed that throughout the entire experimental process, the hydraulic pressure remained continuously stable, with a decrease of only 0.14%; The variation pattern of peak strength of fissured rock mass with increasing crack inclination angle under stable hydraulic pressure changes from a decrease and then an increase in the absence of hydraulic pressure to an increasing trend; The crack propagation length of low angle fissured rock mass is generally higher than that of high angle fissured specimens. …”
-
1818
Stress-strain and hydraulic pressure curves.
Published 2024“…The results showed that throughout the entire experimental process, the hydraulic pressure remained continuously stable, with a decrease of only 0.14%; The variation pattern of peak strength of fissured rock mass with increasing crack inclination angle under stable hydraulic pressure changes from a decrease and then an increase in the absence of hydraulic pressure to an increasing trend; The crack propagation length of low angle fissured rock mass is generally higher than that of high angle fissured specimens. …”
-
1819
CAD drawing of sealing fixture.
Published 2024“…The results showed that throughout the entire experimental process, the hydraulic pressure remained continuously stable, with a decrease of only 0.14%; The variation pattern of peak strength of fissured rock mass with increasing crack inclination angle under stable hydraulic pressure changes from a decrease and then an increase in the absence of hydraulic pressure to an increasing trend; The crack propagation length of low angle fissured rock mass is generally higher than that of high angle fissured specimens. …”
-
1820