Search alternatives:
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
decrease observed » increases observed (Expand Search), case observed (Expand Search)
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
lower decrease » linear decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search)
Showing 21 - 40 results of 31,540 for search '(( significantly ((lower decrease) OR (larger decrease)) ) OR ( significant decrease observed ))', query time: 2.87s Refine Results
  1. 21
    Image_1_Repeated Inoculation of Young Calves With Rumen Microbiota Does Not Significantly Modulate the Rumen Prokaryotic Microbiota Consistently but Decreases Diarrhea.TIF

    Image_1_Repeated Inoculation of Young Calves With Rumen Microbiota Does Not Significantly Modulate the Rumen Prokaryotic Microbiota Consistently but Decreases Diarrhea.TIF by Dengpan Bu (369549)

    Published 2020
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  2. 22
    Image_3_Repeated Inoculation of Young Calves With Rumen Microbiota Does Not Significantly Modulate the Rumen Prokaryotic Microbiota Consistently but Decreases Diarrhea.TIF

    Image_3_Repeated Inoculation of Young Calves With Rumen Microbiota Does Not Significantly Modulate the Rumen Prokaryotic Microbiota Consistently but Decreases Diarrhea.TIF by Dengpan Bu (369549)

    Published 2020
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  3. 23
    Image_5_Repeated Inoculation of Young Calves With Rumen Microbiota Does Not Significantly Modulate the Rumen Prokaryotic Microbiota Consistently but Decreases Diarrhea.TIF

    Image_5_Repeated Inoculation of Young Calves With Rumen Microbiota Does Not Significantly Modulate the Rumen Prokaryotic Microbiota Consistently but Decreases Diarrhea.TIF by Dengpan Bu (369549)

    Published 2020
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  4. 24
    Image_2_Repeated Inoculation of Young Calves With Rumen Microbiota Does Not Significantly Modulate the Rumen Prokaryotic Microbiota Consistently but Decreases Diarrhea.TIF

    Image_2_Repeated Inoculation of Young Calves With Rumen Microbiota Does Not Significantly Modulate the Rumen Prokaryotic Microbiota Consistently but Decreases Diarrhea.TIF by Dengpan Bu (369549)

    Published 2020
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  5. 25
    Pearson’s correlation showing significant correlations (<i>P</i> < 0.05) between microbiota and clinical variables in the Staph group.

    Pearson’s correlation showing significant correlations (<i>P</i> < 0.05) between microbiota and clinical variables in the Staph group. by Paulo Kussek (13410476)

    Published 2022
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  6. 26
    Lower dose of mRNA-LNP still induces protective adaptive immune responses.

    Lower dose of mRNA-LNP still induces protective adaptive immune responses. by Sonia Ndeupen (11993937)

    Published 2022
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  7. 27
    MS decreases the larger amplitude distribution in adult rats.

    MS decreases the larger amplitude distribution in adult rats. by Jesús David Ayala-Rodríguez (17364296)

    Published 2023
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  8. 28
    Superimposition of the cephalometric tracings obtained before and after treatment of case with premolar tooth extraction.

    Superimposition of the cephalometric tracings obtained before and after treatment of case with premolar tooth extraction. by Lijuan Liu (136685)

    Published 2025
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  9. 29
    Superimposition of the cephalometric tracings obtained before and after treatment of case with mandibular third molar extraction.

    Superimposition of the cephalometric tracings obtained before and after treatment of case with mandibular third molar extraction. by Lijuan Liu (136685)

    Published 2025
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  10. 30
    Typical measurement parameters.

    Typical measurement parameters. by Lijuan Liu (136685)

    Published 2025
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  11. 31
    Cephalometric measurement points.

    Cephalometric measurement points. by Lijuan Liu (136685)

    Published 2025
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  12. 32
    Posttreatment facial, intraoral photographs, and radiographs of the case with premolar tooth extraction.

    Posttreatment facial, intraoral photographs, and radiographs of the case with premolar tooth extraction. by Lijuan Liu (136685)

    Published 2025
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  13. 33
    Anonymized raw cephalometric data.

    Anonymized raw cephalometric data. by Lijuan Liu (136685)

    Published 2025
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  14. 34
    Posttreatment facial, intraoral photographs, and radiographs of the case with mandibular third molar extraction.

    Posttreatment facial, intraoral photographs, and radiographs of the case with mandibular third molar extraction. by Lijuan Liu (136685)

    Published 2025
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  15. 35
    Comparison of pretreatment cephalometric variables between premolar extraction and mandibular third molar extraction groups.

    Comparison of pretreatment cephalometric variables between premolar extraction and mandibular third molar extraction groups. by Lijuan Liu (136685)

    Published 2025
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  16. 36
    Demographic characteristics of study participants.

    Demographic characteristics of study participants. by Lijuan Liu (136685)

    Published 2025
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  17. 37
    Results of Analysis of Co-variance (ANCOVA) for change in parameter predicted by treatment group with pre-treatment value as a covariate. * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01.

    Results of Analysis of Co-variance (ANCOVA) for change in parameter predicted by treatment group with pre-treatment value as a covariate. * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01. by Lijuan Liu (136685)

    Published 2025
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  18. 38
    Comparison of treatment effects between premolar extraction and mandibular third molar extraction groups. * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01.

    Comparison of treatment effects between premolar extraction and mandibular third molar extraction groups. * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01. by Lijuan Liu (136685)

    Published 2025
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  19. 39
    Intraoperative facial and intraoral photographs of the case with mandibular third molar extraction.

    Intraoperative facial and intraoral photographs of the case with mandibular third molar extraction. by Lijuan Liu (136685)

    Published 2025
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  20. 40
    Pretreatment facial, intraoral photographs, and radiographs of the case with premolar tooth extraction.

    Pretreatment facial, intraoral photographs, and radiographs of the case with premolar tooth extraction. by Lijuan Liu (136685)

    Published 2025
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:

Search Tools: