Search alternatives:
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
lower decrease » linear decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search)
increase grain » increase grid (Expand Search)
Showing 41 - 60 results of 18,146 for search '(( significantly ((lower decrease) OR (larger decrease)) ) OR ( significant increase grain ))', query time: 0.41s Refine Results
  1. 41
    Posttreatment facial, intraoral photographs, and radiographs of the case with premolar tooth extraction.

    Posttreatment facial, intraoral photographs, and radiographs of the case with premolar tooth extraction. by Lijuan Liu (136685)

    Published 2025
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  2. 42
    Anonymized raw cephalometric data.

    Anonymized raw cephalometric data. by Lijuan Liu (136685)

    Published 2025
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  3. 43
    Posttreatment facial, intraoral photographs, and radiographs of the case with mandibular third molar extraction.

    Posttreatment facial, intraoral photographs, and radiographs of the case with mandibular third molar extraction. by Lijuan Liu (136685)

    Published 2025
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  4. 44
    Comparison of pretreatment cephalometric variables between premolar extraction and mandibular third molar extraction groups.

    Comparison of pretreatment cephalometric variables between premolar extraction and mandibular third molar extraction groups. by Lijuan Liu (136685)

    Published 2025
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  5. 45
    Demographic characteristics of study participants.

    Demographic characteristics of study participants. by Lijuan Liu (136685)

    Published 2025
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  6. 46
    Results of Analysis of Co-variance (ANCOVA) for change in parameter predicted by treatment group with pre-treatment value as a covariate. * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01.

    Results of Analysis of Co-variance (ANCOVA) for change in parameter predicted by treatment group with pre-treatment value as a covariate. * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01. by Lijuan Liu (136685)

    Published 2025
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  7. 47
    Comparison of treatment effects between premolar extraction and mandibular third molar extraction groups. * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01.

    Comparison of treatment effects between premolar extraction and mandibular third molar extraction groups. * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01. by Lijuan Liu (136685)

    Published 2025
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  8. 48
    Intraoperative facial and intraoral photographs of the case with mandibular third molar extraction.

    Intraoperative facial and intraoral photographs of the case with mandibular third molar extraction. by Lijuan Liu (136685)

    Published 2025
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  9. 49
    Pretreatment facial, intraoral photographs, and radiographs of the case with premolar tooth extraction.

    Pretreatment facial, intraoral photographs, and radiographs of the case with premolar tooth extraction. by Lijuan Liu (136685)

    Published 2025
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  10. 50
    Pretreatment facial, intraoral photographs, and radiographs of the case with mandibular third molar extraction.

    Pretreatment facial, intraoral photographs, and radiographs of the case with mandibular third molar extraction. by Lijuan Liu (136685)

    Published 2025
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  11. 51
    The results of KEGG enrichment analysis (Annotation: Circles represent each pathway, and the redder the color, the larger the circle, and the more important it is).

    The results of KEGG enrichment analysis (Annotation: Circles represent each pathway, and the redder the color, the larger the circle, and the more important it is). by Lin Zhou (141050)

    Published 2023
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  12. 52
    Traits at cellular, leaf, and whole-plant scales which were significantly different [increased (↑) or decreased (↓)] or non-significant between tolerant and sensitive cultivars in the N-deficient treatment.

    Traits at cellular, leaf, and whole-plant scales which were significantly different [increased (↑) or decreased (↓)] or non-significant between tolerant and sensitive cultivars in... by Ranjeeta Adhikari (9905958)

    Published 2023
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  13. 53
    CBP per cumulative year for daratumumab and pembrolizumab per vial.

    CBP per cumulative year for daratumumab and pembrolizumab per vial. by R. J. S. D. Heine (17889199)

    Published 2024
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  14. 54
    S4 Fig -

    S4 Fig - by R. J. S. D. Heine (17889199)

    Published 2024
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  15. 55
    S1 Fig -

    S1 Fig - by R. J. S. D. Heine (17889199)

    Published 2024
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  16. 56
    S5 Fig -

    S5 Fig - by R. J. S. D. Heine (17889199)

    Published 2024
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  17. 57
    Scenario analysis for pembrolizumab using a cumulative cost-based price per year per vial.

    Scenario analysis for pembrolizumab using a cumulative cost-based price per year per vial. by R. J. S. D. Heine (17889199)

    Published 2024
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  18. 58
    S3 Fig -

    S3 Fig - by R. J. S. D. Heine (17889199)

    Published 2024
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  19. 59
    S6 Fig -

    S6 Fig - by R. J. S. D. Heine (17889199)

    Published 2024
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  20. 60
    CBP per cumulative indication for daratumumab and pembrolizumab per vial.

    CBP per cumulative indication for daratumumab and pembrolizumab per vial. by R. J. S. D. Heine (17889199)

    Published 2024
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:

Search Tools: