Variation of the most appropriate p value significance threshold with different ratios of the standard deviations and sample sizes. by Farrokh Habibzadeh (12256529)

Comparison of upper and lower arch crowding between premolar extraction group and the mandibular third molar extraction groups. by Lijuan Liu (136685)

Subjects:

Mean ± SD values of unipedal stance parameters evaluated at the different time points of the postural training session. by Cristina Dolciotti (16317330)

Subjects:

Mean ± SD of the different parameters relative to bipedal stance on soft support with the eyes open recorded in the Chewing and Hand Grip groups. by Cristina Dolciotti (16317330)

Subjects:

Time course of Path Length, LFS and Velocity during postural training. by Cristina Dolciotti (16317330)

Subjects:

Relation of the changes in Y Sway Amplitude and LFS induced by postural training with those in 95% Area. by Cristina Dolciotti (16317330)

Subjects:

Training-induced changes in bipedal stance. by Cristina Dolciotti (16317330)

Subjects:

Between-group differences in 95% Area, Y Sway Amplitude and LFS during postural training. by Cristina Dolciotti (16317330)

Subjects:

Relation between training-related changes in unipedal and bipedal stance. by Cristina Dolciotti (16317330)

Subjects:

Consolidation of training-induced changes in unipedal stance: 95% Area, Y Sway Amplitude and LFS. by Cristina Dolciotti (16317330)

Subjects:

Consolidation of training-induced changes in unipedal stance: Path Length, X Sway Amplitude and Velocity. by Cristina Dolciotti (16317330)

Subjects:

Time course of 95% Area, X and Y Amplitude Sway during postural training. by Cristina Dolciotti (16317330)

Subjects:

Correlations between unipedal and bipedal stance parameters recorded at the beginning of the training and of the control session. by Cristina Dolciotti (16317330)

Subjects:

Flow diagram. by Cristina Dolciotti (16317330)

Subjects:

Scheme of g-λ model with larger values λ. by Zhanfeng Fan (20390992)

“…The stress-deformation model of the single uncoupled joint (g-λ model with λ ≥ 1) is employed to depict the nonlinearity of uncoupled joints, with a greater value of the parameter λ signifying a lower degree of non-linearity in the joint model curve. …”

Larger example of stimuli with cue relevant for Task 3. by Marcel F. Hinss (14675457)

Change in Watt’s Connectedness Scale, Subscales by Treatment Group. by Benjamin R. Lewis (22279166)

Subjects:

Primary and secondary efficacy end points (intention-to-treat population). by Benjamin R. Lewis (22279166)

Subjects:

Demographic and clinical characteristics of participants at baseline. by Benjamin R. Lewis (22279166)

Subjects:

Study-related adverse events. by Benjamin R. Lewis (22279166)

Subjects: