Search alternatives:
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
linear decrease » linear increase (Expand Search)
lower decrease » larger decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search)
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
linear decrease » linear increase (Expand Search)
lower decrease » larger decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search)
-
241
-
242
-
243
-
244
-
245
General characteristics and clinical data of the subjects included in the study.
Published 2025Subjects: -
246
-
247
-
248
-
249
-
250
-
251
-
252
-
253
-
254
-
255
Design of the D-trial.
Published 2024“…An increase in PD led to a linear decrease in inflorescence yield per plant (<i>p</i> = 0.02), whereas a positive linear relationship was found for inflorescence yield (<i>p</i> = 0.0001) and CBD yield (<i>p</i> = 0.0002) per m<sup>2</sup>. …”
-
256
Estimated mean values for light interception.
Published 2024“…An increase in PD led to a linear decrease in inflorescence yield per plant (<i>p</i> = 0.02), whereas a positive linear relationship was found for inflorescence yield (<i>p</i> = 0.0001) and CBD yield (<i>p</i> = 0.0002) per m<sup>2</sup>. …”
-
257
Raw data V-trial.
Published 2024“…An increase in PD led to a linear decrease in inflorescence yield per plant (<i>p</i> = 0.02), whereas a positive linear relationship was found for inflorescence yield (<i>p</i> = 0.0001) and CBD yield (<i>p</i> = 0.0002) per m<sup>2</sup>. …”
-
258
Raw data D-trial.
Published 2024“…An increase in PD led to a linear decrease in inflorescence yield per plant (<i>p</i> = 0.02), whereas a positive linear relationship was found for inflorescence yield (<i>p</i> = 0.0001) and CBD yield (<i>p</i> = 0.0002) per m<sup>2</sup>. …”
-
259
-
260