Search alternatives:
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
linear decrease » linear increase (Expand Search)
lower decrease » larger decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search)
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
linear decrease » linear increase (Expand Search)
lower decrease » larger decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search)
-
5181
-
5182
-
5183
Imaging CDK4/6 Broaden Options of Breast Cancer Diagnostics with Positron Emission Tomography
Published 2025Subjects: -
5184
Cinnamaldehyde repellency test within 6 hours in parthenogenesis <i>H. longicornis.</i>
Published 2025Subjects: -
5185
IRs -EGFP-N1 (red) in transfected HEK 293T cells assessed by confocal microscopy.
Published 2025Subjects: -
5186
-
5187
Negative Intrinsic Viscosity in Graphene Nanoparticle Suspensions Induced by Hydrodynamic Slip
Published 2025“…As the concentration of graphene particles increases in the dilute regime, the viscosity initially decreases, falling below that of pure water. At higher concentrations, however, particle aggregation becomes significant, leading to a rise in viscosity after a minimum is reached. …”
-
5188
Negative Intrinsic Viscosity in Graphene Nanoparticle Suspensions Induced by Hydrodynamic Slip
Published 2025“…As the concentration of graphene particles increases in the dilute regime, the viscosity initially decreases, falling below that of pure water. At higher concentrations, however, particle aggregation becomes significant, leading to a rise in viscosity after a minimum is reached. …”
-
5189
Stepped wedge cluster randomized trial design.
Published 2025“…Peridomestic mosquito counts, BPN, and BPH did not differ significantly between renovated and non-renovated households. …”
-
5190
CONSORT diagram.
Published 2024“…The overall proportion of patients who experienced any adverse events was 57.8% in the GDFT group and 70.1% in the conventional group (P = 0.038), of which the occurrence of pleural effusion was significantly lower in the GDFT group than in the conventional group (9.5% vs. 19.7%; P = 0.024). …”
-
5191
Raw data.
Published 2024“…The overall proportion of patients who experienced any adverse events was 57.8% in the GDFT group and 70.1% in the conventional group (P = 0.038), of which the occurrence of pleural effusion was significantly lower in the GDFT group than in the conventional group (9.5% vs. 19.7%; P = 0.024). …”
-
5192
Postoperative outcomes.
Published 2024“…The overall proportion of patients who experienced any adverse events was 57.8% in the GDFT group and 70.1% in the conventional group (P = 0.038), of which the occurrence of pleural effusion was significantly lower in the GDFT group than in the conventional group (9.5% vs. 19.7%; P = 0.024). …”
-
5193
Postoperative complications.
Published 2024“…The overall proportion of patients who experienced any adverse events was 57.8% in the GDFT group and 70.1% in the conventional group (P = 0.038), of which the occurrence of pleural effusion was significantly lower in the GDFT group than in the conventional group (9.5% vs. 19.7%; P = 0.024). …”
-
5194
-
5195
-
5196
-
5197
-
5198
-
5199
-
5200
Raw data.
Published 2025“…The control at 54lbs was significantly higher than at 60lbs (P<0.05). Deformation measurements were 18.53±4.90με, 16.31±4.42με, and 20.90±3.53με, with significantly lower deformation at 54lbs compared to 60lbs (P<0.05). …”