Significant condition. by Junxia Zhou (14381598)

Subjects:

Results of significance for regression factors. by Junxia Zhou (14381598)

Subjects:

Variation of the most appropriate p value significance threshold with different ratios of the standard deviations and sample sizes. by Farrokh Habibzadeh (12256529)

Subjects:

Soil partice-size distribution. by Yonggang Huang (223155)

“…When the UHMWPE content exceeds 0.3% the weight of the soil, there is no significant decrease in the swelling pressure of the reinforced soil (<i>p</i> = 0.052, close to the threshold of significance). …”

Cat Stress Score (CSS) was significantly predicted by intake type and days in the study. by Allison Andrukonis (11846404)

Contrasting Size Dependence of Photochemical Lifetimes of Polypropylene and Expanded Polystyrene Microplastics in Surface Waters by Ariana Patterson (22764051)

Subjects:

Linear covariate analysis of prognostically significant metabolites.... by Emir Matpan (21655811)

“…<p>Linear covariate analysis of prognostically significant metabolites. …”

Scatter plots of the linear regression for the relationship between the duration of the vegetative phase and the average mass of single inflorescences. by Torsten Schober (20485754)

Linear discriminant analysis (LDA) for effect size (LEfSe) analysis of endophytic bacterial communities associated with <i>Synsepalum dulcificum</i> among the three phenotypic grou... by Rabiath F. R. Adigoun (14189090)

Box plot show that there are no differences between different groups of the size of pus cavity. by Na Wang (193263)

Subjects:

Based on our time series data(first from the left), the visualizations of linear residual predictions under different decimation rates (next three) show that as the decimation rate... by Hua Huo (1818133)

Fig 5 - by Torsten Schober (20485754)

Fig 4 - by Torsten Schober (20485754)

Fig 6 - by Torsten Schober (20485754)

Fig 9 - by Torsten Schober (20485754)

Fig 8 - by Torsten Schober (20485754)

Design of the D-trial. by Torsten Schober (20485754)

“…The yield increase could be linked to the increased inflorescence number per plant rather than inflorescence size. In contrast to expectations, neither PD nor DVP had significant effects on the cannabinoid concentration gradient from upper to lower canopy layers. …”

Estimated mean values for light interception. by Torsten Schober (20485754)

“…The yield increase could be linked to the increased inflorescence number per plant rather than inflorescence size. In contrast to expectations, neither PD nor DVP had significant effects on the cannabinoid concentration gradient from upper to lower canopy layers. …”

Raw data V-trial. by Torsten Schober (20485754)

“…The yield increase could be linked to the increased inflorescence number per plant rather than inflorescence size. In contrast to expectations, neither PD nor DVP had significant effects on the cannabinoid concentration gradient from upper to lower canopy layers. …”

Raw data D-trial. by Torsten Schober (20485754)

“…The yield increase could be linked to the increased inflorescence number per plant rather than inflorescence size. In contrast to expectations, neither PD nor DVP had significant effects on the cannabinoid concentration gradient from upper to lower canopy layers. …”