Search alternatives:
significant size » significant side (Expand Search), significant shape (Expand Search), significant sex (Expand Search)
linear decrease » linear increase (Expand Search)
lower decrease » larger decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search)
size decrease » sizes decrease (Expand Search), size increase (Expand Search), size increased (Expand Search)
significant size » significant side (Expand Search), significant shape (Expand Search), significant sex (Expand Search)
linear decrease » linear increase (Expand Search)
lower decrease » larger decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search)
size decrease » sizes decrease (Expand Search), size increase (Expand Search), size increased (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
-
5
-
6
-
7
Design of the D-trial.
Published 2024“…The yield increase could be linked to the increased inflorescence number per plant rather than inflorescence size. In contrast to expectations, neither PD nor DVP had significant effects on the cannabinoid concentration gradient from upper to lower canopy layers. …”
-
8
Estimated mean values for light interception.
Published 2024“…The yield increase could be linked to the increased inflorescence number per plant rather than inflorescence size. In contrast to expectations, neither PD nor DVP had significant effects on the cannabinoid concentration gradient from upper to lower canopy layers. …”
-
9
Raw data V-trial.
Published 2024“…The yield increase could be linked to the increased inflorescence number per plant rather than inflorescence size. In contrast to expectations, neither PD nor DVP had significant effects on the cannabinoid concentration gradient from upper to lower canopy layers. …”
-
10
Raw data D-trial.
Published 2024“…The yield increase could be linked to the increased inflorescence number per plant rather than inflorescence size. In contrast to expectations, neither PD nor DVP had significant effects on the cannabinoid concentration gradient from upper to lower canopy layers. …”
-
11
-
12
-
13
-
14
Optimisation of read depth, DNA quantity, and unique alternate observation threshold.
Published 2025“…C: The association between expected VAF and observed VAF according to read depth. Lower read depth may contribute to an overestimated VAF of very small variants, although differences did not reach significance. …”
-
15
Data_.xlsx
Published 2024“…Results indicated significant group-by-time interactions in all measures of physical fitness (effect size [ES] = 1.03 to 2.89). …”
-
16
Supplementary Material for: Association between microbiome dysbiosis and postoperative disorders before and after gastrectomy
Published 2025“…Bacterial taxa demonstrating significant changes were determined using the Linear Discriminant Analysis Effect Size algorithm and further analyzed for their relationship with weight loss in the gastrectomy cohort. …”
-
17
Supplementary Material for: Healing Diabetic Foot Ulcers with Topical Timolol Improves Healed Epithelial Integrity
Published 2025“…Results: Transepidermal water loss at 1-, 2- and 3-months post-healing was significantly lower in the timolol group than in the placebo group (p<0.01). …”
-
18
Data Sheet 1_Clinical predictors and concomitant antiseizure medications effects on seizure control in relation to plasma cenobamate concentration: a multicenter retrospective stud...
Published 2025“…Although its mechanism of action is not fully understood, CNB enhances inhibitory GABAergic transmission and blocks voltage-gated sodium channels. Its non-linear pharmacokinetics and strong modulation of cytochrome P450 enzymes may significantly affect the metabolism of co-administered ASMs, posing important challenges for polytherapy management. …”
-
19
Table_1_Elevated serum albumin-to-creatinine ratio as a protective factor on clinical outcomes among critically ill patients with sepsis: a retrospective study.DOCX
Published 2024“…Kaplan–Meier survival analysis demonstrated that patients with higher ACR had a significantly lower risk of 30−/60-day mortality (log-rank p < 0.001). …”
-
20
Table 1_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.docx
Published 2025“…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …”