Search alternatives:
significant source » significant burden (Expand Search), significant cause (Expand Search)
source increased » use increased (Expand Search), size increased (Expand Search), care increased (Expand Search)
linear decrease » linear increase (Expand Search)
lower decrease » larger decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search)
significant source » significant burden (Expand Search), significant cause (Expand Search)
source increased » use increased (Expand Search), size increased (Expand Search), care increased (Expand Search)
linear decrease » linear increase (Expand Search)
lower decrease » larger decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search)
-
21
Image_1_Decrease in Serum Urate Level Is Associated With Loss of Visceral Fat in Male Gout Patients.tif
Published 2021“…By multiple regression model, ΔSU was identified to be a significant determinant variable of decrease in VFA (beta, 0.302; p = 0.001).…”
-
22
-
23
The source code of LazyAct.
Published 2025“…The inferences reduction significantly decreases the time and FLOPs required by the <i>LazyAct</i> algorithm to complete tasks. …”
-
24
-
25
-
26
-
27
DataSheet_1_Decrease in Serum Urate Level Is Associated With Loss of Visceral Fat in Male Gout Patients.docx
Published 2021“…By multiple regression model, ΔSU was identified to be a significant determinant variable of decrease in VFA (beta, 0.302; p = 0.001).…”
-
28
-
29
-
30
-
31
-
32
-
33
-
34
-
35
Effect of Si sources and Si application methods on antioxidant enzymes activity of maize.
Published 2021Subjects: -
36
-
37
Indicators and data sources for the health level and influencing factors of older adults.
Published 2024Subjects: -
38
-
39
-
40
Temporal trend (1972–2017) of ∑PCB (upper graph) and PCB TEQ (lower graph) in osprey eggs in the whole dataset and in different study areas.
Published 2024“…A smoothed green line is shown for non-linear trend components if p < 0.05 (ANOVA). Both ∑PCB and PCB TEQ decreased significantly in the whole dataset (annual decrease 3.5 and 4.0%, respectively) and in all study areas (annual decrease 2.2–4.4%).…”