Search alternatives:
linear decrease » linear increase (Expand Search)
higher decrease » higher degree (Expand Search), higher degrees (Expand Search), highest increase (Expand Search)
lower decrease » larger decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search)
linear decrease » linear increase (Expand Search)
higher decrease » higher degree (Expand Search), higher degrees (Expand Search), highest increase (Expand Search)
lower decrease » larger decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search)
-
561
-
562
-
563
Group control-after intervention.
Published 2025“…Comparing the two groups after the intervention, the intervention group demonstrated significantly lower SAS scores (t = -10.348, P < 0.001), SDS scores (t = -8.416, P < 0.001), and PSQI scores (t = -5.087, P < 0.001), while FertiQoL scores were higher than the control group (t = 2.389, P = 0.019). …”
-
564
Group SFA-before intervention.
Published 2025“…Comparing the two groups after the intervention, the intervention group demonstrated significantly lower SAS scores (t = -10.348, P < 0.001), SDS scores (t = -8.416, P < 0.001), and PSQI scores (t = -5.087, P < 0.001), while FertiQoL scores were higher than the control group (t = 2.389, P = 0.019). …”
-
565
Lost cases.
Published 2025“…Comparing the two groups after the intervention, the intervention group demonstrated significantly lower SAS scores (t = -10.348, P < 0.001), SDS scores (t = -8.416, P < 0.001), and PSQI scores (t = -5.087, P < 0.001), while FertiQoL scores were higher than the control group (t = 2.389, P = 0.019). …”
-
566
Group control-before intervention.
Published 2025“…Comparing the two groups after the intervention, the intervention group demonstrated significantly lower SAS scores (t = -10.348, P < 0.001), SDS scores (t = -8.416, P < 0.001), and PSQI scores (t = -5.087, P < 0.001), while FertiQoL scores were higher than the control group (t = 2.389, P = 0.019). …”
-
567
Patient satisfaction with SFA intervention(%).
Published 2025“…Comparing the two groups after the intervention, the intervention group demonstrated significantly lower SAS scores (t = -10.348, P < 0.001), SDS scores (t = -8.416, P < 0.001), and PSQI scores (t = -5.087, P < 0.001), while FertiQoL scores were higher than the control group (t = 2.389, P = 0.019). …”
-
568
Pre-Experiment.
Published 2025“…Comparing the two groups after the intervention, the intervention group demonstrated significantly lower SAS scores (t = -10.348, P < 0.001), SDS scores (t = -8.416, P < 0.001), and PSQI scores (t = -5.087, P < 0.001), while FertiQoL scores were higher than the control group (t = 2.389, P = 0.019). …”
-
569
Group SFA-after intervention.
Published 2025“…Comparing the two groups after the intervention, the intervention group demonstrated significantly lower SAS scores (t = -10.348, P < 0.001), SDS scores (t = -8.416, P < 0.001), and PSQI scores (t = -5.087, P < 0.001), while FertiQoL scores were higher than the control group (t = 2.389, P = 0.019). …”
-
570
-
571
-
572
Trend of specific mental health disorders for all services utilization between 2016 and 2022.
Published 2024Subjects: -
573
-
574
-
575
-
576
-
577
Threading Behavior and Dynamics of Ring-Linear Polymer Blends under Poiseuille Flow
Published 2024“…However, as rings are semiflexible (<i>K</i><sub>br</sub> > 0), the threading probability significantly decreases and then significantly increases as the flow field strength increases. …”
-
578
-
579
-
580