Students preferences on teaching post-pandemic: <i><i>Results displayed in percentages.</i></i> by Katy Andrews (22311170)

Subjects:

Participants pathway to resilience at the height of the Covid-19 pandemic. <i><i>Results displayed in percentages.</i></i> by Katy Andrews (22311170)

Subjects:

Consequences of remote and blended learning on participants wellbeing in academic year 2020-2021. <i><i>Results displayed in percentages.</i></i> by Katy Andrews (22311170)

Subjects:

Working at home – students’ workplaces. <i><i>Results displayed in percentages.</i></i> by Katy Andrews (22311170)

Subjects:

Covid-19 pandemic and living arrangements for students. <i><i>Results displayed in percentages.</i></i> by Katy Andrews (22311170)

Subjects:

Learn!Bio study: Grouping of Participants. by Katy Andrews (22311170)

Subjects:

IT technology & the post-pandemic generation of HE learners. <i><i>Results displayed in percentages.</i></i> by Katy Andrews (22311170)

Subjects:

Effects of the third national lockdown on learning for bioscience students. <i><i>Results displayed in percentages.</i></i> by Katy Andrews (22311170)

Subjects:

Long-term effects of remote learning on current bioscience students. Results displayed in percentages. by Katy Andrews (22311170)

Subjects:

Remote learning: Preferences on recorded content. <i><i>Results displayed in percentages.</i></i> by Katy Andrews (22311170)

Subjects:

How mental health changed compared to last semester. <i><i>Results displayed in percentages.</i></i> by Katy Andrews (22311170)

Subjects:

Effects of students pre-University learning on current university progression. <i><i>Results displayed in percentages.</i></i> by Katy Andrews (22311170)

Subjects:

Contents of PIO Program. by Jun-Seo Lim (21161776)

“…The difference between the two groups was statistically significant (<i>t</i> = 3.94, <i>p</i><.001). Depression decreased -0.7±3.48 in the experimental group, from 5.9±4.74 before intervention to 5.2±4.65 after intervention, and decreased by -0.2±3.42, from 6.5±4.69 before intervention to 6.4±4.08 after intervention, in the control group, but the difference between the two groups was not statistically significant (<i>z</i> = -0.59, <i>p</i> =.557). …”

Demographic characteristics of participants. by Jun-Seo Lim (21161776)

“…The difference between the two groups was statistically significant (<i>t</i> = 3.94, <i>p</i><.001). Depression decreased -0.7±3.48 in the experimental group, from 5.9±4.74 before intervention to 5.2±4.65 after intervention, and decreased by -0.2±3.42, from 6.5±4.69 before intervention to 6.4±4.08 after intervention, in the control group, but the difference between the two groups was not statistically significant (<i>z</i> = -0.59, <i>p</i> =.557). …”

Social robot PIO (version 3.5). by Jun-Seo Lim (21161776)

“…The difference between the two groups was statistically significant (<i>t</i> = 3.94, <i>p</i><.001). Depression decreased -0.7±3.48 in the experimental group, from 5.9±4.74 before intervention to 5.2±4.65 after intervention, and decreased by -0.2±3.42, from 6.5±4.69 before intervention to 6.4±4.08 after intervention, in the control group, but the difference between the two groups was not statistically significant (<i>z</i> = -0.59, <i>p</i> =.557). …”

12 session programs of social robot PIO. by Jun-Seo Lim (21161776)

“…The difference between the two groups was statistically significant (<i>t</i> = 3.94, <i>p</i><.001). Depression decreased -0.7±3.48 in the experimental group, from 5.9±4.74 before intervention to 5.2±4.65 after intervention, and decreased by -0.2±3.42, from 6.5±4.69 before intervention to 6.4±4.08 after intervention, in the control group, but the difference between the two groups was not statistically significant (<i>z</i> = -0.59, <i>p</i> =.557). …”

Table 1_United States military working dogs from 2019 to 2021: analysis of causes of service discharge and decreased service life.docx by Dakota Discepolo (16804191)

“…ANOVA analysis comparing mean service life resulted in significant differences of mean overall service with main effects of breed (p = 0.0252), outcome (p = 0.0004), service discharge category (p < 0.0001), and subpopulation (p < 0.0001).…”

Comparison of the Area under the Total Airway Resistance Curve (RL-area) under Different Doses of Methacholine Challenge Test (cmH₂O/mL). by Fangwei Xu (11845586)

Subjects:

Changes in Body Weight (g) of Guinea Pigs in each group before and after modeling. by Fangwei Xu (11845586)

Subjects:

Changes in airway resistance after excitation with different concentrations of acetylmethacholine. by Fangwei Xu (11845586)

Subjects: