Search alternatives:
significantly increased » significant increase (Expand Search)
increased decrease » increased release (Expand Search), increased crash (Expand Search)
lower decrease » larger decrease (Expand Search), linear decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search)
significantly increased » significant increase (Expand Search)
increased decrease » increased release (Expand Search), increased crash (Expand Search)
lower decrease » larger decrease (Expand Search), linear decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search)
-
1741
-
1742
-
1743
-
1744
-
1745
-
1746
Effects of increasing gravel on initial escape latency in non-injured <i>vs.</i>
Published 2025“…</b> However latency was significantly decrease for the 40 g condition in the injured day 0 animals. **** indicates significant differences across increasing amounts of gravel (p < 0.0001). * indicates a post-hoc test confirming a significant difference between injured and non-injured animals 40 g (p < 0.05).…”
-
1747
-
1748
-
1749
-
1750
-
1751
-
1752
-
1753
Box plot displaying the distributions of the deconvolution derived proportions of cell types.
Published 2024Subjects: -
1754
Spearman correlation of age with proportions of cell types in men, for each brain region.
Published 2024Subjects: -
1755
-
1756
-
1757
-
1758
Demographic and ocular features.
Published 2025“…Pearson analysis revealed significant negative correlations: SOD with anterior chamber depth (r = −0.445, p = 0.012) and H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> with mean deviation values for the visual field (r = −0.412, p = 0.041). …”
-
1759
Machine learning model to diagnose PCG.
Published 2025“…Pearson analysis revealed significant negative correlations: SOD with anterior chamber depth (r = −0.445, p = 0.012) and H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> with mean deviation values for the visual field (r = −0.412, p = 0.041). …”
-
1760
ROC curves of TAS + SOD + MDA to diagnose PCG.
Published 2025“…Pearson analysis revealed significant negative correlations: SOD with anterior chamber depth (r = −0.445, p = 0.012) and H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> with mean deviation values for the visual field (r = −0.412, p = 0.041). …”