Search alternatives:
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
lower decrease » larger decrease (Expand Search), linear decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search)
teer decrease » mean decrease (Expand Search), greater decrease (Expand Search)
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
lower decrease » larger decrease (Expand Search), linear decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search)
teer decrease » mean decrease (Expand Search), greater decrease (Expand Search)
-
4981
-
4982
-
4983
Imaging CDK4/6 Broaden Options of Breast Cancer Diagnostics with Positron Emission Tomography
Published 2025Subjects: -
4984
Cinnamaldehyde repellency test within 6 hours in parthenogenesis <i>H. longicornis.</i>
Published 2025Subjects: -
4985
IRs -EGFP-N1 (red) in transfected HEK 293T cells assessed by confocal microscopy.
Published 2025Subjects: -
4986
-
4987
Negative Intrinsic Viscosity in Graphene Nanoparticle Suspensions Induced by Hydrodynamic Slip
Published 2025“…As the concentration of graphene particles increases in the dilute regime, the viscosity initially decreases, falling below that of pure water. At higher concentrations, however, particle aggregation becomes significant, leading to a rise in viscosity after a minimum is reached. …”
-
4988
Negative Intrinsic Viscosity in Graphene Nanoparticle Suspensions Induced by Hydrodynamic Slip
Published 2025“…As the concentration of graphene particles increases in the dilute regime, the viscosity initially decreases, falling below that of pure water. At higher concentrations, however, particle aggregation becomes significant, leading to a rise in viscosity after a minimum is reached. …”
-
4989
Stepped wedge cluster randomized trial design.
Published 2025“…Peridomestic mosquito counts, BPN, and BPH did not differ significantly between renovated and non-renovated households. …”
-
4990
CONSORT diagram.
Published 2024“…The overall proportion of patients who experienced any adverse events was 57.8% in the GDFT group and 70.1% in the conventional group (P = 0.038), of which the occurrence of pleural effusion was significantly lower in the GDFT group than in the conventional group (9.5% vs. 19.7%; P = 0.024). …”
-
4991
Raw data.
Published 2024“…The overall proportion of patients who experienced any adverse events was 57.8% in the GDFT group and 70.1% in the conventional group (P = 0.038), of which the occurrence of pleural effusion was significantly lower in the GDFT group than in the conventional group (9.5% vs. 19.7%; P = 0.024). …”
-
4992
Postoperative outcomes.
Published 2024“…The overall proportion of patients who experienced any adverse events was 57.8% in the GDFT group and 70.1% in the conventional group (P = 0.038), of which the occurrence of pleural effusion was significantly lower in the GDFT group than in the conventional group (9.5% vs. 19.7%; P = 0.024). …”
-
4993
Postoperative complications.
Published 2024“…The overall proportion of patients who experienced any adverse events was 57.8% in the GDFT group and 70.1% in the conventional group (P = 0.038), of which the occurrence of pleural effusion was significantly lower in the GDFT group than in the conventional group (9.5% vs. 19.7%; P = 0.024). …”
-
4994
-
4995
-
4996
-
4997
-
4998
-
4999
-
5000
Raw data.
Published 2025“…The control at 54lbs was significantly higher than at 60lbs (P<0.05). Deformation measurements were 18.53±4.90με, 16.31±4.42με, and 20.90±3.53με, with significantly lower deformation at 54lbs compared to 60lbs (P<0.05). …”