Search alternatives:
significant linear » significant clinical (Expand Search), significant gender (Expand Search), significant level (Expand Search)
linear decrease » linear increase (Expand Search)
lower decrease » larger decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search), showed decreased (Expand Search)
we decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search)
significant linear » significant clinical (Expand Search), significant gender (Expand Search), significant level (Expand Search)
linear decrease » linear increase (Expand Search)
lower decrease » larger decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search), showed decreased (Expand Search)
we decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
BMI groups by SES.
Published 2025“…This relationship was not found in higher economic status women. Our study had two significant findings. We first found an obesity paradox in PTB for those mothers who are LSES. …”
-
3
BMISES_Data_Part2.
Published 2025“…This relationship was not found in higher economic status women. Our study had two significant findings. We first found an obesity paradox in PTB for those mothers who are LSES. …”
-
4
Logistic regression for LSES population.
Published 2025“…This relationship was not found in higher economic status women. Our study had two significant findings. We first found an obesity paradox in PTB for those mothers who are LSES. …”
-
5
Logistic regression for HSES population.
Published 2025“…This relationship was not found in higher economic status women. Our study had two significant findings. We first found an obesity paradox in PTB for those mothers who are LSES. …”
-
6
Logistic regression for overall population.
Published 2025“…This relationship was not found in higher economic status women. Our study had two significant findings. We first found an obesity paradox in PTB for those mothers who are LSES. …”
-
7
BMISES_Data_Part1.
Published 2025“…This relationship was not found in higher economic status women. Our study had two significant findings. We first found an obesity paradox in PTB for those mothers who are LSES. …”
-
8
Baseline characteristics of HSES/LSES population.
Published 2025“…This relationship was not found in higher economic status women. Our study had two significant findings. We first found an obesity paradox in PTB for those mothers who are LSES. …”
-
9
Baseline characteristics of overall population.
Published 2025“…This relationship was not found in higher economic status women. Our study had two significant findings. We first found an obesity paradox in PTB for those mothers who are LSES. …”
-
10
Diagram of study population.
Published 2025“…This relationship was not found in higher economic status women. Our study had two significant findings. We first found an obesity paradox in PTB for those mothers who are LSES. …”
-
11
Design of the D-trial.
Published 2024“…In contrast to expectations, neither PD nor DVP had significant effects on the cannabinoid concentration gradient from upper to lower canopy layers. …”
-
12
Estimated mean values for light interception.
Published 2024“…In contrast to expectations, neither PD nor DVP had significant effects on the cannabinoid concentration gradient from upper to lower canopy layers. …”
-
13
Raw data V-trial.
Published 2024“…In contrast to expectations, neither PD nor DVP had significant effects on the cannabinoid concentration gradient from upper to lower canopy layers. …”
-
14
Raw data D-trial.
Published 2024“…In contrast to expectations, neither PD nor DVP had significant effects on the cannabinoid concentration gradient from upper to lower canopy layers. …”
-
15
Recruitment flow diagram of the current study.
Published 2025“…Phase 1 EQ-VAS decreases were associated with female sex, lower somatic symptom, fewer comorbidities, lack of expectation for a fast recovery, higher ISS, higher injury pain, neck, spine/back or lower extremity injuries. …”
-
16
Flow diagram of participants selection.
Published 2025“…Participants in the highest BRI quartile had significantly lower ASM/ BMI levels, with corresponding β values of − 0.17. …”
-
17
Minimal data set.
Published 2025“…Participants in the highest BRI quartile had significantly lower ASM/ BMI levels, with corresponding β values of − 0.17. …”
-
18
Weighted comparison of baseline characteristics.
Published 2025“…Participants in the highest BRI quartile had significantly lower ASM/ BMI levels, with corresponding β values of − 0.17. …”
-
19
Functional and strength parameters.
Published 2025“…</p><p>Methods</p><p>Bilateral quantitative MRI of the lower limbs was performed in individuals with LGMD-R9 and healthy controls. …”
-
20