Search alternatives:
significance levels » significance level (Expand Search)
marked decrease » marked increase (Expand Search)
levels decrease » levels decreased (Expand Search), levels increased (Expand Search), rivers decreased (Expand Search)
significance levels » significance level (Expand Search)
marked decrease » marked increase (Expand Search)
levels decrease » levels decreased (Expand Search), levels increased (Expand Search), rivers decreased (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
-
5
-
6
-
7
-
8
-
9
-
10
-
11
-
12
-
13
-
14
Participants enrollment.
Published 2025“…Among the 422 caregivers who participated in the study, 267 (63.2%) were females and mean age was 44.94 years. The baseline mean knowledge level score was 9.5 (38.0%) and rose to 21.08 (84.3%) p = 0.000 immediate post-health education and a 2.1% decrease 20.54 (82.2%) p<0.001 at week six from the immediate post health education score. …”
-
15
KAP assessment scores (n = 422).
Published 2025“…Among the 422 caregivers who participated in the study, 267 (63.2%) were females and mean age was 44.94 years. The baseline mean knowledge level score was 9.5 (38.0%) and rose to 21.08 (84.3%) p = 0.000 immediate post-health education and a 2.1% decrease 20.54 (82.2%) p<0.001 at week six from the immediate post health education score. …”
-
16
-
17
-
18
-
19
S1 Data -
Published 2024“…The square root of the detectable connectivity r = 0.09 suggests that only 0.81% of the connectivity is explained by working memory-related time course fluctuations. Null hypothesis significance testing (NHST)-based analysis revealed that within-subject time course reliability markedly affects the significance levels at which paths can be detected at the group level. …”
-
20
Connectivity statistics.
Published 2024“…The square root of the detectable connectivity r = 0.09 suggests that only 0.81% of the connectivity is explained by working memory-related time course fluctuations. Null hypothesis significance testing (NHST)-based analysis revealed that within-subject time course reliability markedly affects the significance levels at which paths can be detected at the group level. …”