Differences in mean number of papers (top) and co-authors (bottom) depending on (1) NI membership and (2) time joined NI. by William C. Barley (8915282)

Study selection criteria. by Filip Stanicic (17808254)

“…CAPS improvement was persistent for CPT and PE in long-term follow up (mean duration 6.2 years).</p><p>MDMA-AT demonstrated significant improvement in BDI-II score compared to PT (19.7-point vs. 10.8-point decrease, respectively; p = 0.003). …”

PICOS criteria for the SLR. by Filip Stanicic (17808254)

“…CAPS improvement was persistent for CPT and PE in long-term follow up (mean duration 6.2 years).</p><p>MDMA-AT demonstrated significant improvement in BDI-II score compared to PT (19.7-point vs. 10.8-point decrease, respectively; p = 0.003). …”

PRISMA flow chart. by Filip Stanicic (17808254)

“…CAPS improvement was persistent for CPT and PE in long-term follow up (mean duration 6.2 years).</p><p>MDMA-AT demonstrated significant improvement in BDI-II score compared to PT (19.7-point vs. 10.8-point decrease, respectively; p = 0.003). …”

Number of habituation sessions (mean ± standard deviation) of weaned piglets and gilts per batch (1, 2), habituation stage (different group sizes, individual), duration per habitua... by Sara Hintze (3216885)

Geometric mean anti-<i>Na</i>-GST-1 IgG subclass levels over time. by David J. Diemert (8135568)

Geometric mean anti-<i>Na</i>-GST-1 IgG levels over time by vaccine group, as measured by ELISA (Arbitrary Units). by David J. Diemert (8135568)

Proportion of time spent in the Start Room or Avoidance Room or showing a behaviour (Stimulus Contact) presented across stimuli and separately for piglets and gilts. by Sara Hintze (3216885)

Frequencies of different behaviours (Compartment Changes, Escape Attempts, Stimulus Orientation, Stimulus Approach, Stimulus Contact, Grunting, Barking, Excretion), the minimum dis... by Sara Hintze (3216885)

Flow chart of experimental protocol. by Eun-Seon Yang (19751340)

“…SBP showed an increasing trend, but this was not statistically significant (<i>p</i> = 0.108). Interestingly, we observed significant decreases in arterial stiffness and PWV in POST_VM when comparing with PRE_VM (<i>p</i><0.001 and <i>p</i><0.001, respectively). …”

A representative ultrasound axis image. by Eun-Seon Yang (19751340)

“…SBP showed an increasing trend, but this was not statistically significant (<i>p</i> = 0.108). Interestingly, we observed significant decreases in arterial stiffness and PWV in POST_VM when comparing with PRE_VM (<i>p</i><0.001 and <i>p</i><0.001, respectively). …”

Molecular dynamics simulation results for Apo-TP53 (red), wild-typeTP53. by Ashraf Attia Mahmoud (21262201)

Fuzzy c-mean clustering. by Janaina de Freitas Nascimento (3849415)

Fig 4 - by Kirralise J. Hansford (20670869)

Histogram of the extracted parameters. by Qiuyu Du (20760848)

“…Subsequently, lines were fitted on intensities within a region of interest perpendicularly to the aorta centerline, from which three parameters were extracted: mean intensity, proximal intensity and contrast gradient. …”

Valve closing capability and hemolymph flow analysis. by Christian Meyer (6035)

“…(J) Analysis of hemolymph flow in the aorta. Mean pixel intensity of the dye package is significantly reduced upon valve malformation, indicating less hemolymph is pumped (Scheme illustrates dye package in the aorta and its area analyzed). …”

Group results for Experiment 1 and 2. by Adam M. Roth (19845864)

Search strategy. by Alvine M. Akumbom (20460907)

“…GMT results of HPV16 and HPV18 genotypes were significantly lower in PWH; Hedges’s g -0.434 (95% CI: -0.823, -0.046) and Hedges’s g -0.57 (95% CI: -0.72, -0.43), respectively. …”

Fig 1 - by Alvine M. Akumbom (20460907)

“…GMT results of HPV16 and HPV18 genotypes were significantly lower in PWH; Hedges’s g -0.434 (95% CI: -0.823, -0.046) and Hedges’s g -0.57 (95% CI: -0.72, -0.43), respectively. …”

GMT by age cohort for PWH and PWoH. by Alvine M. Akumbom (20460907)

“…GMT results of HPV16 and HPV18 genotypes were significantly lower in PWH; Hedges’s g -0.434 (95% CI: -0.823, -0.046) and Hedges’s g -0.57 (95% CI: -0.72, -0.43), respectively. …”