Search alternatives:
significant results » significant reductions (Expand Search), significant reduction (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
significant results » significant reductions (Expand Search), significant reduction (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
-
5
-
6
-
7
-
8
-
9
-
10
-
11
A summary of the included study characteristics.
Published 2025“…Sixteen studies were included in the meta-analysis. The results show that one month after the NSPT, there was no significant difference in the mean visfatin level of GCF (SMD: -3.91, 95%CI: -9.83, 2.01, p = 0.195, I-square, 96.6%, random effect model, n = 2) and serum (SMD: -0.33, 95%CI: -0.98, 0.33, p = 0.332, fixed effect model, n = 1), but 2, 3 and 6 months after NSPT, the mean visfatin level of GCF and serum decreased significantly. …”
-
12
-
13
-
14
-
15
-
16
-
17
-
18
Significant repeated measurements sEMG outcomes.
Published 2025“…The post hoc test shows systematically higher percentage values in the CAI group (normalized results with MVC) and higher mean activity of peroneal muscle in patients without CAI. …”
-
19
Significant single measurement sEMG outcomes.
Published 2025“…The post hoc test shows systematically higher percentage values in the CAI group (normalized results with MVC) and higher mean activity of peroneal muscle in patients without CAI. …”
-
20
List of Included studies.
Published 2025“…Sixteen studies were included in the meta-analysis. The results show that one month after the NSPT, there was no significant difference in the mean visfatin level of GCF (SMD: -3.91, 95%CI: -9.83, 2.01, p = 0.195, I-square, 96.6%, random effect model, n = 2) and serum (SMD: -0.33, 95%CI: -0.98, 0.33, p = 0.332, fixed effect model, n = 1), but 2, 3 and 6 months after NSPT, the mean visfatin level of GCF and serum decreased significantly. …”